Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P — 32″ · 4K QD-OLED · 240Hz
Gigabyte

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

32″ · 4K QD-OLED · 240Hz

92
/ 100
From $1,399
VS
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P wins by 2
Gigabyte MO34WQC2 — 34″ ultrawide QD-OLED · 175Hz · DP 1.4
Gigabyte

Gigabyte MO34WQC2

34″ ultrawide QD-OLED · 175Hz · DP 1.4

90
/ 100
From $749
Specdex verdict

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P lands at 92 and Gigabyte MO34WQC2 at 90. That puts Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P ahead by 2 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P if…

  • ✓Current panel tech
  • ✓Strong factory calibration
  • ✓Modern connectivity

Pick Gigabyte MO34WQC2 if…

  • ✓34″ QD-OLED ultrawide at $749
  • ✓Dual-mode 1080p @ 350Hz
  • ✓Glossy panel reduces grayish tint
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Picture quality

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

Color accuracy and HDR performance

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P leads on hdr (92 vs 88).

Value for money

Gigabyte MO34WQC2

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Gigabyte MO34WQC2 more score per dollar ($749 vs $1,399).

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P 92
vs
90 Gigabyte MO34WQC2

Score breakdown

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
92
color 92
motion 96
hdr 92
features 90
display 0
gaming 0
ergonomics 0
value 0
Gigabyte MO34WQC2
90
color 0
motion 92
hdr 88
features 0
display 95
gaming 95
ergonomics 84
value 92

Specs side-by-side

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P versus Gigabyte MO34WQC2 — full spec comparison
Spec Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P Gigabyte MO34WQC2
Panel
4K QD-OLED
—
Size
32"
—
Refresh
240Hz
—
Release year
2024
—
Display
—
34″ QD-OLED, 1800R curve
Resolution
—
3440×1440
Refresh rate
—
175 Hz native (350 Hz at 1080p dual mode)
Response time
—
0.03 ms (GtG)
HDR
—
DisplayHDR True Black 400
Connectivity
—
2× HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4 DSC, USB-C 18W

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

Pros
  • +Current panel tech
  • +Strong factory calibration
  • +Modern connectivity
Cons
  • −Stand footprint large on bigger sizes
  • −HDR varies by model
  • −OLED burn-in risk

Gigabyte MO34WQC2

Pros
  • +34″ QD-OLED ultrawide at $749
  • +Dual-mode 1080p @ 350Hz
  • +Glossy panel reduces grayish tint
Cons
  • −No DisplayPort 2.1
  • −1800R curve not for everyone
  • −OSD joystick fiddly

FAQ: Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P vs Gigabyte MO34WQC2

Which is better, Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P or Gigabyte MO34WQC2? +

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P scores 92 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 2. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P worth the price? +

At $1,399, Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in motion.

Is Gigabyte MO34WQC2 worth the price? +

At $749, Gigabyte MO34WQC2 delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in display.

Does Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P or Gigabyte MO34WQC2 last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for picture quality, Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P or Gigabyte MO34WQC2? +

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P — leads on hdr (92 vs 88). Color accuracy and HDR performance.

Which is the better value, Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P or Gigabyte MO34WQC2? +

Gigabyte MO34WQC2 — more score per dollar ($749 vs $1,399). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.