Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra — Exynos W1000 · Titanium · 100 m WR
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra

Exynos W1000 · Titanium · 100 m WR

89
/ 100
From $649
VS
Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop) wins by 4
Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop) — 2023 · Fitness + health
Apple

Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop)

2023 · Fitness + health

93
/ 100
From $829
Specdex verdict

Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop) takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra lands at 89 and Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop) at 93. That puts Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop) ahead by 4 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra if…

  • 100 m water resistance
  • Multi-band GPS L1+L5
  • Sapphire glass + titanium case

Pick Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop) if…

  • Multi-day fitness tracking
  • GPS + heart rate
  • Notification mirroring
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Durability

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra

Compared on the durability sub-score

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra leads on durability (96 vs 86).

Health

Tie

Compared on the health sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Display

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra

Compared on the display sub-score

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra leads on display (92 vs 88).

Value for money

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra more score per dollar ($649 vs $829).

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 89
vs
93 Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop)

Score breakdown

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra
89
health 90
battery 86
display 92
software 86
durability 96
fitness 0
Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop)
93
health 91
battery 72
display 88
software 0
durability 86
fitness 93

Specs side-by-side

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra versus Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop) — full spec comparison
Spec Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop)
Case
47 mm titanium
Display
480×480 LTPO Sapphire OLED
Chipset
Exynos W1000
Battery
100 h power-saver / 36 h standard
Connectivity
GPS L1+L5, BT 5.3, Wi-Fi 6, LTE
Water resist
100 m + IP68
Release year
2023

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra

Pros
  • +100 m water resistance
  • +Multi-band GPS L1+L5
  • +Sapphire glass + titanium case
Cons
  • Battery shorter than Apple Watch Ultra
  • No raise-to-wake on low-power
  • Limited iOS support

Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop)

Pros
  • +Multi-day fitness tracking
  • +GPS + heart rate
  • +Notification mirroring
Cons
  • Battery life varies dramatically
  • Companion phone required
  • Screen-on drains battery

FAQ: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop)

Which is better, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra or Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop)? +

Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop) scores 93 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 4. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra worth the price? +

At $649, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in durability.

Is Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop) worth the price? +

At $829, Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop) delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in fitness.

Does Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra or Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop) last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for durability, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra or Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop)? +

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra — leads on durability (96 vs 86). Compared on the durability sub-score.

Which is better for display, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra or Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Milanese Loop)? +

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra — leads on display (92 vs 88). Compared on the display sub-score.