Fujifilm
Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R
Prime/Zoom
91
/ 100
From $1,499
VS
Sigma
Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art
Prime/Zoom
91
/ 100
From $1,499
Specdex verdict
Dead heat — it comes down to priorities.
In our weighted Specdex score, Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R lands at 91 and Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art at 91. With scores tied, the decision hinges on which sub-scores matter most to you.
Pick Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R if…
- ✓Fast aperture
- ✓Quiet autofocus
- ✓Weather-sealed (most)
Pick Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art if…
- ✓Fast autofocus
- ✓Weather-sealed
- ✓Premium optics
Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R 91
vs 91 Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art
Score breakdown
Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R
91 sharpness 91
af 89
build 88
value 85
Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art
91 sharpness 91
af 90
build 94
value 84
Specs side-by-side
| Spec | Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R | Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art |
|---|
Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R
Pros
- +Fast aperture
- +Quiet autofocus
- +Weather-sealed (most)
Cons
- −Mount-specific
- −Weight varies
- −Price scales with quality
Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art
Pros
- +Fast autofocus
- +Weather-sealed
- +Premium optics
Cons
- −Heavy
- −Expensive
- −Focus breathing varies
FAQ: Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R vs Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art
Which is better, Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R or Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art? +
Both score 91 on our weighted rubric — tied. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.
Is Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R worth the price? +
At $1,499, Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in sharpness.
Is Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art worth the price? +
At $1,499, Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in build.
Does Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R or Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art last longer? +
Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.