Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R — Prime/Zoom
Fujifilm

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R

Prime/Zoom

91
/ 100
From $1,499
VS
Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R wins by 3
Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S — Prime/Zoom
Nikon

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Prime/Zoom

88
/ 100
From $1,099
Specdex verdict

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R lands at 91 and Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S at 88. That puts Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R if…

  • ✓Fast aperture
  • ✓Quiet autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed (most)

Pick Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S if…

  • ✓Fast aperture
  • ✓Quiet autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed (most)
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Sharpness

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R leads on sharpness (91 vs 88).

Build

Tie

Compared on the build sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Autofocus

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R leads on af (89 vs 86).

Value for money

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S more score per dollar ($1,099 vs $1,499).

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R 91
vs
88 Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Score breakdown

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R
91
sharpness 91
af 89
build 88
value 85
Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S
88
sharpness 88
af 86
build 88
value 85

Specs side-by-side

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R versus Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S — full spec comparison
Spec Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R

Pros
  • +Fast aperture
  • +Quiet autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed (most)
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Weight varies
  • −Price scales with quality

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Pros
  • +Fast aperture
  • +Quiet autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed (most)
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Weight varies
  • −Price scales with quality

FAQ: Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R vs Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Which is better, Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R or Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S? +

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R scores 91 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R worth the price? +

At $1,499, Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S worth the price? +

At $1,099, Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in sharpness.

Does Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R or Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for sharpness, Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R or Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S? +

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R — leads on sharpness (91 vs 88). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R or Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S? +

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R — leads on af (89 vs 86). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.