Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR — Prime/Zoom
Fujifilm

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Prime/Zoom

92
/ 100
From $1,599
VS
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR wins by 4
Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD — Prime/Zoom
Tamron

Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD

Prime/Zoom

88
/ 100
From $1,399
Specdex verdict

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR lands at 92 and Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD at 88. That puts Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR ahead by 4 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR if…

  • ✓Fast autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed
  • ✓Premium optics

Pick Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD if…

  • ✓Fast aperture
  • ✓Quiet autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed (most)
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Compared on the build sub-score

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR leads on build (94 vs 88).

Sharpness

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR leads on sharpness (92 vs 88).

Autofocus

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR leads on af (91 vs 86).

Value for money

Tie

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Effectively tied — similar score-per-dollar at MSRP.

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 92
vs
88 Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD

Score breakdown

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR
92
sharpness 92
af 91
build 94
value 84
Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
88
sharpness 88
af 86
build 88
value 85

Specs side-by-side

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR versus Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD — full spec comparison
Spec Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Expensive
  • −Focus breathing varies

Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD

Pros
  • +Fast aperture
  • +Quiet autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed (most)
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Weight varies
  • −Price scales with quality

FAQ: Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR vs Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD

Which is better, Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR or Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD? +

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR scores 92 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 4. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR worth the price? +

At $1,599, Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in build.

Is Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD worth the price? +

At $1,399, Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in sharpness.

Does Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR or Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for build, Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR or Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD? +

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR — leads on build (94 vs 88). Compared on the build sub-score.

Which is better for sharpness, Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR or Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD? +

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR — leads on sharpness (92 vs 88). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.