Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR — Prime/Zoom
Fujifilm

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Prime/Zoom

92
/ 100
From $1,599
VS
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR wins by 1
Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art — Prime/Zoom
Sigma

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Prime/Zoom

91
/ 100
From $1,499
Specdex verdict

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR lands at 92 and Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art at 91. That puts Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR if…

  • Fast autofocus
  • Weather-sealed
  • Premium optics

Pick Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art if…

  • Fast autofocus
  • Weather-sealed
  • Premium optics
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Tie

Compared on the build sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Sharpness

Tie

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Autofocus

Tie

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Value for money

Tie

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Effectively tied — similar score-per-dollar at MSRP.

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 92
vs
91 Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Score breakdown

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR
92
sharpness 92
af 91
build 94
value 84
Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art
91
sharpness 91
af 90
build 94
value 84

Specs side-by-side

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR versus Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art — full spec comparison
Spec Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • Heavy
  • Expensive
  • Focus breathing varies

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • Heavy
  • Expensive
  • Focus breathing varies

FAQ: Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR vs Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Which is better, Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR or Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art? +

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR scores 92 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR worth the price? +

At $1,599, Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in build.

Is Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art worth the price? +

At $1,499, Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in build.

Does Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR or Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.