Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR — Prime/Zoom
Fujifilm

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Prime/Zoom

92
/ 100
From $1,599
VS
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR wins by 4
Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S — Prime/Zoom
Nikon

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Prime/Zoom

88
/ 100
From $1,099
Specdex verdict

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR lands at 92 and Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S at 88. That puts Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR ahead by 4 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR if…

  • ✓Fast autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed
  • ✓Premium optics

Pick Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S if…

  • ✓Fast aperture
  • ✓Quiet autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed (most)
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Compared on the build sub-score

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR leads on build (94 vs 88).

Sharpness

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR leads on sharpness (92 vs 88).

Autofocus

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR leads on af (91 vs 86).

Value for money

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S more score per dollar ($1,099 vs $1,599).

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 92
vs
88 Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Score breakdown

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR
92
sharpness 92
af 91
build 94
value 84
Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S
88
sharpness 88
af 86
build 88
value 85

Specs side-by-side

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR versus Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S — full spec comparison
Spec Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Expensive
  • −Focus breathing varies

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Pros
  • +Fast aperture
  • +Quiet autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed (most)
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Weight varies
  • −Price scales with quality

FAQ: Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR vs Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Which is better, Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR or Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S? +

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR scores 92 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 4. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR worth the price? +

At $1,599, Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in build.

Is Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S worth the price? +

At $1,099, Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in sharpness.

Does Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR or Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for build, Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR or Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S? +

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR — leads on build (94 vs 88). Compared on the build sub-score.

Which is better for sharpness, Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR or Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S? +

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR — leads on sharpness (92 vs 88). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.