Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR — Prime/Zoom
Fujifilm

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR

Prime/Zoom

90
/ 100
From $1,199
VS
Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art wins by 1
Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art — Prime/Zoom
Sigma

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Prime/Zoom

91
/ 100
From $1,499
Specdex verdict

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR lands at 90 and Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art at 91. That puts Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR if…

  • ✓Fast autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed
  • ✓Premium optics

Pick Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art if…

  • ✓Fast autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed
  • ✓Premium optics
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Tie

Compared on the build sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Sharpness

Tie

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Autofocus

Tie

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Value for money

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR more score per dollar ($1,199 vs $1,499).

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR 90
vs
91 Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Score breakdown

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR
90
sharpness 90
af 89
build 94
value 84
Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art
91
sharpness 91
af 90
build 94
value 84

Specs side-by-side

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR versus Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art — full spec comparison
Spec Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Expensive
  • −Focus breathing varies

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Expensive
  • −Focus breathing varies

FAQ: Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR vs Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Which is better, Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR or Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art? +

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art scores 91 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR worth the price? +

At $1,199, Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in build.

Is Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art worth the price? +

At $1,499, Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in build.

Does Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR or Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR or Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art? +

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR — more score per dollar ($1,199 vs $1,499). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.