Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR — Prime/Zoom
Fujifilm

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR

Prime/Zoom

90
/ 100
From $1,199
VS
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR wins by 2
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR — Prime/Zoom
Fujifilm

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Prime/Zoom

92
/ 100
From $1,599
Specdex verdict

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR lands at 90 and Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR at 92. That puts Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR ahead by 2 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR if…

  • ✓Fast autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed
  • ✓Premium optics

Pick Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR if…

  • ✓Fast autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed
  • ✓Premium optics
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Tie

Compared on the build sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Sharpness

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR leads on sharpness (92 vs 90).

Autofocus

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR leads on af (91 vs 89).

Value for money

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR more score per dollar ($1,199 vs $1,599).

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR 90
vs
92 Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Score breakdown

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR
90
sharpness 90
af 89
build 94
value 84
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR
92
sharpness 92
af 91
build 94
value 84

Specs side-by-side

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR versus Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR — full spec comparison
Spec Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Expensive
  • −Focus breathing varies

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Expensive
  • −Focus breathing varies

FAQ: Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR vs Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Which is better, Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR or Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR? +

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR scores 92 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 2. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR worth the price? +

At $1,199, Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in build.

Is Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR worth the price? +

At $1,599, Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in build.

Does Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR or Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for sharpness, Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR or Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR? +

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR — leads on sharpness (92 vs 90). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR or Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR? +

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR — leads on af (91 vs 89). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.