Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
EPYC 9654 — Zen 4 · 96C/192T · SP5
AMD

EPYC 9654

Zen 4 · 96C/192T · SP5

96
/ 100
From $11,805
VS
EPYC 9654 wins by 3
Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — Panther Lake · 26C · 6.0 GHz
Intel

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Panther Lake · 26C · 6.0 GHz

93
/ 100
From $649
Specdex verdict

EPYC 9654 takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, EPYC 9654 lands at 96 and Intel Core Ultra 9 395K at 93. That puts EPYC 9654 ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick EPYC 9654 if…

  • Massive core counts
  • ECC memory support
  • Workstation/server-grade platform

Pick Intel Core Ultra 9 395K if…

  • Latest generation silicon
  • Improved perf-per-watt
  • Full modern feature set
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Gaming

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K leads on gaming (94 vs 76).

Creators & productivity

EPYC 9654

Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count

EPYC 9654 leads on multi (96 vs 93).

Power efficiency

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Performance per watt — thermals, PSU headroom, electricity cost

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K leads on efficiency (86 vs 78).

Value for money

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K more score per dollar ($649 vs $11,805).

EPYC 9654 96
vs
93 Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Score breakdown

EPYC 9654
96
single 88
multi 96
gaming 76
efficiency 78
Intel Core Ultra 9 395K
93
single 95
multi 93
gaming 94
efficiency 86

Specs side-by-side

EPYC 9654 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — full spec comparison
Spec EPYC 9654 Intel Core Ultra 9 395K
Architecture
Zen 4
Panther Lake
Cores
96
26 (8P+16E+2LP)
Threads
192
26
Socket
SP5
LGA1851
Release year
2022
2025

EPYC 9654

Pros
  • +Massive core counts
  • +ECC memory support
  • +Workstation/server-grade platform
Cons
  • Niche platform, limited motherboards
  • High TDP requires serious cooling
  • Premium price

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Pros
  • +Latest generation silicon
  • +Improved perf-per-watt
  • +Full modern feature set
Cons
  • Premium pricing
  • Requires up-to-date platform
  • Initial stock scarcity likely

FAQ: EPYC 9654 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Which is better, EPYC 9654 or Intel Core Ultra 9 395K? +

EPYC 9654 scores 96 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is EPYC 9654 worth the price? +

At $11,805, EPYC 9654 delivers a Specdex score of 96 — strongest in multi.

Is Intel Core Ultra 9 395K worth the price? +

At $649, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in single.

Does EPYC 9654 or Intel Core Ultra 9 395K last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for gaming, EPYC 9654 or Intel Core Ultra 9 395K? +

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — leads on gaming (94 vs 76). Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed.

Which is better for creator and productivity work, EPYC 9654 or Intel Core Ultra 9 395K? +

EPYC 9654 — leads on multi (96 vs 93). Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count.