Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Crucial T705 4TB · bare — PCIe 5.0 · 14500/12700 MB/s · 4TB
Crucial

Crucial T705 4TB · bare

PCIe 5.0 · 14500/12700 MB/s · 4TB

92
/ 100
From $720
VS
Crucial T705 4TB · bare wins by 19
Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB — 2TB · PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,000 MB/s read · PassMark #54
Lexar

Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB

2TB · PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,000 MB/s read · PassMark #54

73
/ 100
From $200
Specdex verdict

Crucial T705 4TB · bare takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Crucial T705 4TB · bare lands at 92 and Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB at 73. That puts Crucial T705 4TB · bare ahead by 19 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Crucial T705 4TB · bare if…

  • M.2 NVMe
  • Competitive per-GB cost
  • TBW scales with capacity

Pick Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB if…

  • Capable NVMe drive at PassMark rank #54
  • 14 GB/s-class PCIe 5.0 reads in a slim single-sided M.2 layout
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB more score per dollar ($200 vs $720).

Crucial T705 4TB · bare 92
vs
73 Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB

Score breakdown

Crucial T705 4TB · bare
92
read 98
write 96
endurance 88
value 84
ssd 0
passmark_disk 0
Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB
73
read 0
write 0
endurance 0
value 0
ssd 73
passmark_disk 76799

Specs side-by-side

Crucial T705 4TB · bare versus Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB — full spec comparison
Spec Crucial T705 4TB · bare Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB
Interface
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe
Capacity
4TB
Read/Write
14500/12700 MB/s
Form factor
M.2 2280 (single-sided, 2.45mm)
Sequential read
14,000 MB/s
Sequential write
10,000 MB/s
Random read
2,000,000 IOPS
Random write
1,500,000 IOPS
Controller
8-channel, reported MaxioTek MAP1806 class
NAND
3D TLC
DRAM
DRAM-less (HMB, per ComputerBase report)
Endurance
1,500 TBW
Warranty
5 years
PassMark Disk Score
76,799
PassMark rank
#54 of 100 consumer SSDs

Crucial T705 4TB · bare

Pros
  • +M.2 NVMe
  • +Competitive per-GB cost
  • +TBW scales with capacity
Cons
  • Thermals on Gen 5 drives
  • DRAM-less models slower under sustained load
  • Require heatsinks in many systems

Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB

Pros
  • +Capable NVMe drive at PassMark rank #54
  • +14 GB/s-class PCIe 5.0 reads in a slim single-sided M.2 layout
Cons
  • DRAM-less controllers on lower-tier variants may throttle under sustained writes
  • Newer drives out-perform this generation on sequential + random 4K

FAQ: Crucial T705 4TB · bare vs Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB

Which is better, Crucial T705 4TB · bare or Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB? +

Crucial T705 4TB · bare scores 92 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 19. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Crucial T705 4TB · bare worth the price? +

At $720, Crucial T705 4TB · bare delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in read.

Is Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB worth the price? +

At $200, Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB delivers a Specdex score of 73 — strongest in passmark_disk.

Does Crucial T705 4TB · bare or Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Crucial T705 4TB · bare or Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB? +

Lexar SSD ARES PRO 2TB — more score per dollar ($200 vs $720). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.