Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Crucial T700 4TB · bare — PCIe 5.0 · 12400/11800 MB/s · 4TB
Crucial

Crucial T700 4TB · bare

PCIe 5.0 · 12400/11800 MB/s · 4TB

92
/ 100
From $720
VS
Crucial T700 4TB · bare wins by 14
Samsung 9100 PRO with Heatsink 4TB — 4TB · PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,800 MB/s read · PassMark #32
Samsung

Samsung 9100 PRO with Heatsink 4TB

4TB · PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,800 MB/s read · PassMark #32

78
/ 100
From $569
Specdex verdict

Crucial T700 4TB · bare takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Crucial T700 4TB · bare lands at 92 and Samsung 9100 PRO with Heatsink 4TB at 78. That puts Crucial T700 4TB · bare ahead by 14 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Crucial T700 4TB · bare if…

  • M.2 NVMe
  • Competitive per-GB cost
  • TBW scales with capacity

Pick Samsung 9100 PRO with Heatsink 4TB if…

  • Strong PCIe 5.0 performance at PassMark rank #32
  • Pro-tier controller and DRAM cache for sustained throughput
  • PCIe 5.0 interface for next-gen platforms (AM5, LGA 1851)
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

Tie

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Effectively tied — similar score-per-dollar at MSRP.

Crucial T700 4TB · bare 92
vs
78 Samsung 9100 PRO with Heatsink 4TB

Score breakdown

Crucial T700 4TB · bare
92
read 98
write 96
endurance 88
value 84
ssd 0
passmark_disk 0
Samsung 9100 PRO with Heatsink 4TB
78
read 0
write 0
endurance 0
value 0
ssd 78
passmark_disk 82353

Specs side-by-side

Crucial T700 4TB · bare versus Samsung 9100 PRO with Heatsink 4TB — full spec comparison
Spec Crucial T700 4TB · bare Samsung 9100 PRO with Heatsink 4TB
Interface
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe 2.0
Capacity
4TB
Read/Write
12400/11800 MB/s
Form factor
M.2 2280 (with heatsink)
Sequential read
14,800 MB/s
Sequential write
13,400 MB/s
Random read
2,200,000 IOPS
Random write
2,600,000 IOPS
Controller
Samsung Presto (in-house, 5nm)
NAND
Samsung V8 V-NAND 3D TLC (236-layer)
DRAM
yes, LPDDR4X
Endurance
2,400 TBW
Warranty
5 years
PassMark Disk Score
82,353
PassMark rank
#32 of 100 consumer SSDs

Crucial T700 4TB · bare

Pros
  • +M.2 NVMe
  • +Competitive per-GB cost
  • +TBW scales with capacity
Cons
  • Thermals on Gen 5 drives
  • DRAM-less models slower under sustained load
  • Require heatsinks in many systems

Samsung 9100 PRO with Heatsink 4TB

Pros
  • +Strong PCIe 5.0 performance at PassMark rank #32
  • +Pro-tier controller and DRAM cache for sustained throughput
  • +PCIe 5.0 interface for next-gen platforms (AM5, LGA 1851)
Cons
  • PCIe 5.0 drives run hot — heatsink or motherboard M.2 cooling recommended
  • Pricing varies — confirm current retail before purchase

FAQ: Crucial T700 4TB · bare vs Samsung 9100 PRO with Heatsink 4TB

Which is better, Crucial T700 4TB · bare or Samsung 9100 PRO with Heatsink 4TB? +

Crucial T700 4TB · bare scores 92 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 14. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Crucial T700 4TB · bare worth the price? +

At $720, Crucial T700 4TB · bare delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in read.

Is Samsung 9100 PRO with Heatsink 4TB worth the price? +

At $569, Samsung 9100 PRO with Heatsink 4TB delivers a Specdex score of 78 — strongest in passmark_disk.

Does Crucial T700 4TB · bare or Samsung 9100 PRO with Heatsink 4TB last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.