Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Crucial MX500 2 TB — SATA · 560 MB/s · TLC
Crucial

Crucial MX500 2 TB

SATA · 560 MB/s · TLC

84
/ 100
From $119
VS
Crucial MX500 2 TB wins by 1
XPG MARS 980 BLADE — PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,000 MB/s read · PassMark #17
XPG

XPG MARS 980 BLADE

PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,000 MB/s read · PassMark #17

83
/ 100
From $300
Specdex verdict

Crucial MX500 2 TB takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Crucial MX500 2 TB lands at 84 and XPG MARS 980 BLADE at 83. That puts Crucial MX500 2 TB ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Crucial MX500 2 TB if…

  • Cheapest reliable 2 TB SATA SSD
  • 5-year warranty
  • Good for older laptops + secondary storage

Pick XPG MARS 980 BLADE if…

  • PassMark Disk Score top-20 (88,359) — sustained-write class-leading
  • Current street price around $721
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

Crucial MX500 2 TB

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Crucial MX500 2 TB more score per dollar ($119 vs $300).

Crucial MX500 2 TB 84
vs
83 XPG MARS 980 BLADE

Score breakdown

Crucial MX500 2 TB
84
speed 70
endurance 88
software 88
value 100
reliability 92
ssd 0
passmark_disk 0
XPG MARS 980 BLADE
83
speed 0
endurance 0
software 0
value 0
reliability 0
ssd 83
passmark_disk 88359

Specs side-by-side

Crucial MX500 2 TB versus XPG MARS 980 BLADE — full spec comparison
Spec Crucial MX500 2 TB XPG MARS 980 BLADE
Capacity
500 GB / 1 / 2 / 4 TB
Interface
SATA III 6 Gb/s
PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe 2.0
Sequential read
560 MB/s
14,000 MB/s
Sequential write
510 MB/s
13,000 MB/s
NAND
Micron 3D TLC
232-layer Micron 3D TLC
Endurance
700 TBW (2TB)
1,480 TBW
Warranty
5 years
5 years
Form factor
M.2 2280 (passive, heat-spreader label)
Random read
2,000,000 IOPS
Random write
1,650,000 IOPS
Controller
Silicon Motion SM2508 (TSMC 6nm)
DRAM
yes (DRAM cache buffer)
PassMark Disk Score
88,359
PassMark rank
#17 of 100 consumer SSDs

Crucial MX500 2 TB

Pros
  • +Cheapest reliable 2 TB SATA SSD
  • +5-year warranty
  • +Good for older laptops + secondary storage
Cons
  • SATA bottleneck (560 MB/s ceiling)
  • TLC NAND
  • No NVMe option

XPG MARS 980 BLADE

Pros
  • +PassMark Disk Score top-20 (88,359) — sustained-write class-leading
  • +Current street price around $721
Cons
  • DRAM-less controllers on lower-tier variants may throttle under sustained writes

FAQ: Crucial MX500 2 TB vs XPG MARS 980 BLADE

Which is better, Crucial MX500 2 TB or XPG MARS 980 BLADE? +

Crucial MX500 2 TB scores 84 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Crucial MX500 2 TB worth the price? +

At $119, Crucial MX500 2 TB delivers a Specdex score of 84 — strongest in value.

Is XPG MARS 980 BLADE worth the price? +

At $300, XPG MARS 980 BLADE delivers a Specdex score of 83 — strongest in passmark_disk.

Does Crucial MX500 2 TB or XPG MARS 980 BLADE last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Crucial MX500 2 TB or XPG MARS 980 BLADE? +

Crucial MX500 2 TB — more score per dollar ($119 vs $300). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.