Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK — Mid-tower · Triple-glass · iCUE LINK ready
Corsair

Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK

Mid-tower · Triple-glass · iCUE LINK ready

89
/ 100
From $169
VS
Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal wins by 1
Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal — Mini-ITX
Cooler Master

Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal

Mini-ITX

90
/ 100
From $99
Specdex verdict

Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK lands at 89 and Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal at 90. That puts Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK if…

  • ✓Triple tempered-glass panels
  • ✓iCUE LINK pre-wired for fans
  • ✓Dual-chamber layout

Pick Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal if…

  • ✓Tool-less panels on most
  • ✓Cable-management channels
  • ✓Dust filters
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK

Compared on the build sub-score

Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK leads on build (92 vs 88).

Airflow

Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal

Compared on the airflow sub-score

Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal leads on airflow (90 vs 88).

Value for money

Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal more score per dollar ($99 vs $169).

Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK 89
vs
90 Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal

Score breakdown

Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK
89
build 92
airflow 88
ease 92
design 92
value 84
features 0
Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal
90
build 88
airflow 90
ease 0
design 0
value 86
features 84

Specs side-by-side

Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK versus Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal — full spec comparison
Spec Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal
Form
Mid-tower ATX
—
Dimensions
485×245×485 mm
—
Front panel
Tempered glass + glass top + glass left
—
GPU clearance
410 mm
—
Radiator support
4× 360 mm
—
Color
Black, White
—
Type
—
Mini-ITX

Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK

Pros
  • +Triple tempered-glass panels
  • +iCUE LINK pre-wired for fans
  • +Dual-chamber layout
Cons
  • −iCUE LINK ecosystem locks you in
  • −Premium price for ARGB
  • −Heavy

Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal

Pros
  • +Tool-less panels on most
  • +Cable-management channels
  • +Dust filters
Cons
  • −Fan inclusion varies
  • −GPU clearance limits for triple-slot cards
  • −Weight on glass panels

FAQ: Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK vs Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal

Which is better, Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK or Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal? +

Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal scores 90 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK worth the price? +

At $169, Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in build.

Is Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal worth the price? +

At $99, Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in airflow.

Does Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK or Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for build, Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK or Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal? +

Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK — leads on build (92 vs 88). Compared on the build sub-score.

Which is better for airflow, Corsair 3500X iCUE LINK or Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal? +

Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P · Charcoal — leads on airflow (90 vs 88). Compared on the airflow sub-score.