Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Core Ultra 9 285K — Arrow Lake · 24C · 5.7 GHz · LGA1851
Intel

Core Ultra 9 285K

Arrow Lake · 24C · 5.7 GHz · LGA1851

89
/ 100
From $589
VS
Core Ultra 9 285K wins by 15
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — 64C/128T · 5.1 GHz · 350 W TDP · sTR5 · PassMark #17
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

64C/128T · 5.1 GHz · 350 W TDP · sTR5 · PassMark #17

74
/ 100
From $7,399
Specdex verdict

Core Ultra 9 285K takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Core Ultra 9 285K lands at 89 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX at 74. That puts Core Ultra 9 285K ahead by 15 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Core Ultra 9 285K if…

  • Far more efficient than 14900K
  • Strong multi-thread productivity
  • New LGA1851 platform with DDR5-6400

Pick Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX if…

  • PassMark rank #17 — strong productivity throughput
  • Workstation-tier core counts for rendering and compilation
  • Current PassMark-tracked street price around $7,399
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

Core Ultra 9 285K

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Core Ultra 9 285K more score per dollar ($589 vs $7,399).

Core Ultra 9 285K 89
vs
74 Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Score breakdown

Core Ultra 9 285K
89
single 92
multi 94
gaming 85
efficiency 90
cpu 0
passmark 0
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
74
single 0
multi 0
gaming 0
efficiency 0
cpu 74
passmark 131837

Specs side-by-side

Core Ultra 9 285K versus Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX — full spec comparison
Spec Core Ultra 9 285K Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Cores
24 (8P + 16E)
64
Threads
24
128
Base clock
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost clock
5.7 GHz
5.1 GHz
L3 cache
36 MB
256 MB
TDP
125 W (PL1) / 250 W (PL2)
350 W
Socket
LGA1851
sTR5
Process
TSMC N3B
iGPU
Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG, 4 Xe cores @ 2.0 GHz)
NPU
13 TOPS
Memory
DDR5-6400
Class
Desktop, Server
PassMark rank
#17 of 5,901
PassMark CPU Mark
131,837

Core Ultra 9 285K

Pros
  • +Far more efficient than 14900K
  • +Strong multi-thread productivity
  • +New LGA1851 platform with DDR5-6400
Cons
  • Gaming regresses vs 14900K in some titles
  • No hyper-threading (24 threads from 24 cores)
  • 13 TOPS NPU is modest

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Pros
  • +PassMark rank #17 — strong productivity throughput
  • +Workstation-tier core counts for rendering and compilation
  • +Current PassMark-tracked street price around $7,399
Cons
  • Workstation platform — overkill for gaming-only builds

FAQ: Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Which is better, Core Ultra 9 285K or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX? +

Core Ultra 9 285K scores 89 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 15. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Core Ultra 9 285K worth the price? +

At $589, Core Ultra 9 285K delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in multi.

Is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX worth the price? +

At $7,399, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX delivers a Specdex score of 74 — strongest in passmark.

Does Core Ultra 9 285K or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Core Ultra 9 285K or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX? +

Core Ultra 9 285K — more score per dollar ($589 vs $7,399). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.