Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Core Ultra 9 285K — Arrow Lake · 24C · 5.7 GHz · LGA1851
Intel

Core Ultra 9 285K

Arrow Lake · 24C · 5.7 GHz · LGA1851

89
/ 100
From $589
VS
Core Ultra 9 285K wins by 53
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — 24C/48T · 4.5 GHz · 280 W TDP · sWRX8 · PassMark #136
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

24C/48T · 4.5 GHz · 280 W TDP · sWRX8 · PassMark #136

36
/ 100
From $1,553
Specdex verdict

Core Ultra 9 285K takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Core Ultra 9 285K lands at 89 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX at 36. That puts Core Ultra 9 285K ahead by 53 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Core Ultra 9 285K if…

  • Far more efficient than 14900K
  • Strong multi-thread productivity
  • New LGA1851 platform with DDR5-6400

Pick Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX if…

  • PassMark #136 of 5,901 — capable workhorse
  • Workstation-tier core counts for rendering and compilation
  • Current PassMark-tracked street price around $1,553
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

Core Ultra 9 285K

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Core Ultra 9 285K more score per dollar ($589 vs $1,553).

Core Ultra 9 285K 89
vs
36 Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Score breakdown

Core Ultra 9 285K
89
single 92
multi 94
gaming 85
efficiency 90
cpu 0
passmark 0
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
36
single 0
multi 0
gaming 0
efficiency 0
cpu 36
passmark 65886

Specs side-by-side

Core Ultra 9 285K versus Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — full spec comparison
Spec Core Ultra 9 285K Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Cores
24 (8P + 16E)
24
Threads
24
48
Base clock
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost clock
5.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
L3 cache
36 MB
128 MB
TDP
125 W (PL1) / 250 W (PL2)
280 W
Socket
LGA1851
sWRX8
Process
TSMC N3B
iGPU
Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG, 4 Xe cores @ 2.0 GHz)
NPU
13 TOPS
Memory
DDR5-6400
Class
Desktop, Server
PassMark rank
#136 of 5,901
PassMark CPU Mark
65,886

Core Ultra 9 285K

Pros
  • +Far more efficient than 14900K
  • +Strong multi-thread productivity
  • +New LGA1851 platform with DDR5-6400
Cons
  • Gaming regresses vs 14900K in some titles
  • No hyper-threading (24 threads from 24 cores)
  • 13 TOPS NPU is modest

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Pros
  • +PassMark #136 of 5,901 — capable workhorse
  • +Workstation-tier core counts for rendering and compilation
  • +Current PassMark-tracked street price around $1,553
Cons
  • Workstation platform — overkill for gaming-only builds

FAQ: Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Which is better, Core Ultra 9 285K or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX? +

Core Ultra 9 285K scores 89 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 53. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Core Ultra 9 285K worth the price? +

At $589, Core Ultra 9 285K delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in multi.

Is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX worth the price? +

At $1,553, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX delivers a Specdex score of 36 — strongest in passmark.

Does Core Ultra 9 285K or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Core Ultra 9 285K or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX? +

Core Ultra 9 285K — more score per dollar ($589 vs $1,553). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.