Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Core Ultra 9 285 — 24C/24T · 5.4 GHz · 65 W · PassMark #193
Intel

Core Ultra 9 285

24C/24T · 5.4 GHz · 65 W · PassMark #193

32
/ 100
From $579
VS
Core Ultra 9 285K wins by 57
Core Ultra 9 285K — Arrow Lake · 24C · 5.7 GHz · LGA1851
Intel

Core Ultra 9 285K

Arrow Lake · 24C · 5.7 GHz · LGA1851

89
/ 100
From $589
Specdex verdict

Core Ultra 9 285K takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Core Ultra 9 285 lands at 32 and Core Ultra 9 285K at 89. That puts Core Ultra 9 285K ahead by 57 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Core Ultra 9 285 if…

  • PassMark #193 of 5,901 — capable workhorse
  • Intel's latest architecture with on-chip NPU
  • Current PassMark-tracked street price around $579

Pick Core Ultra 9 285K if…

  • Far more efficient than 14900K
  • Strong multi-thread productivity
  • New LGA1851 platform with DDR5-6400
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

Core Ultra 9 285K

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Core Ultra 9 285K more score per dollar ($589 vs $579).

Core Ultra 9 285 32
vs
89 Core Ultra 9 285K

Score breakdown

Core Ultra 9 285
32
cpu 32
passmark 57575
single 0
multi 0
gaming 0
efficiency 0
Core Ultra 9 285K
89
cpu 0
passmark 0
single 92
multi 94
gaming 85
efficiency 90

Specs side-by-side

Core Ultra 9 285 versus Core Ultra 9 285K — full spec comparison
Spec Core Ultra 9 285 Core Ultra 9 285K
Cores
24 (8P + 16E)
24 (8P + 16E)
Threads
24
24
Base clock
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost clock
5.4 GHz
5.7 GHz
L3 cache
36 MB
36 MB
TDP
65 W base / 182 W turbo
125 W (PL1) / 250 W (PL2)
Socket
LGA 1851
LGA1851
Class
Desktop
PassMark rank
#193 of 5,901
PassMark CPU Mark
57,575
Process
TSMC N3B
iGPU
Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG, 4 Xe cores @ 2.0 GHz)
NPU
13 TOPS
Memory
DDR5-6400

Core Ultra 9 285

Pros
  • +PassMark #193 of 5,901 — capable workhorse
  • +Intel's latest architecture with on-chip NPU
  • +Current PassMark-tracked street price around $579
Cons
  • Requires recent-generation motherboard and DDR5 memory
  • Newer-generation parts pull ahead in current rankings

Core Ultra 9 285K

Pros
  • +Far more efficient than 14900K
  • +Strong multi-thread productivity
  • +New LGA1851 platform with DDR5-6400
Cons
  • Gaming regresses vs 14900K in some titles
  • No hyper-threading (24 threads from 24 cores)
  • 13 TOPS NPU is modest

FAQ: Core Ultra 9 285 vs Core Ultra 9 285K

Which is better, Core Ultra 9 285 or Core Ultra 9 285K? +

Core Ultra 9 285K scores 89 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 57. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Core Ultra 9 285 worth the price? +

At $579, Core Ultra 9 285 delivers a Specdex score of 32 — strongest in passmark.

Is Core Ultra 9 285K worth the price? +

At $589, Core Ultra 9 285K delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in multi.

Does Core Ultra 9 285 or Core Ultra 9 285K last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Core Ultra 9 285 or Core Ultra 9 285K? +

Core Ultra 9 285K — more score per dollar ($589 vs $579). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.