Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Core Ultra 7 265 — 20C/20T · 5.2 GHz · 65 W · PassMark #262
Intel

Core Ultra 7 265

20C/20T · 5.2 GHz · 65 W · PassMark #262

28
/ 100
From $326
VS
Core i9-14900K wins by 61
Core i9-14900K — Raptor Lake Refresh · 24C/32T · 125 W · LGA1700
Intel

Core i9-14900K

Raptor Lake Refresh · 24C/32T · 125 W · LGA1700

89
/ 100
From $589
Specdex verdict

Core i9-14900K takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Core Ultra 7 265 lands at 28 and Core i9-14900K at 89. That puts Core i9-14900K ahead by 61 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Core Ultra 7 265 if…

  • PassMark CPU Mark of 49,724 — solid multi-thread numbers
  • Intel's latest architecture with on-chip NPU
  • Current PassMark-tracked street price around $326

Pick Core i9-14900K if…

  • Strong per-core performance
  • Hybrid P/E cores (12th gen+)
  • Wide platform availability
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

Core i9-14900K

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Core i9-14900K more score per dollar ($589 vs $326).

Core Ultra 7 265 28
vs
89 Core i9-14900K

Score breakdown

Core Ultra 7 265
28
cpu 28
passmark 49724
single 0
multi 0
gaming 0
efficiency 0
Core i9-14900K
89
cpu 0
passmark 0
single 91
multi 89
gaming 88
efficiency 81

Specs side-by-side

Core Ultra 7 265 versus Core i9-14900K — full spec comparison
Spec Core Ultra 7 265 Core i9-14900K
Cores
20 (8P + 12E)
24
Threads
20
32
Base clock
2.4 GHz
Boost clock
5.2 GHz
L3 cache
30 MB
TDP
65 W base / 182 W turbo
125 W
Socket
LGA 1851
LGA1700
Class
Desktop
PassMark rank
#262 of 5,901
PassMark CPU Mark
49,724
Architecture
Raptor Lake Refresh
Release year
2023

Core Ultra 7 265

Pros
  • +PassMark CPU Mark of 49,724 — solid multi-thread numbers
  • +Intel's latest architecture with on-chip NPU
  • +Current PassMark-tracked street price around $326
Cons
  • Requires recent-generation motherboard and DDR5 memory
  • Newer-generation parts pull ahead in current rankings

Core i9-14900K

Pros
  • +Strong per-core performance
  • +Hybrid P/E cores (12th gen+)
  • +Wide platform availability
Cons
  • Power draw on top SKUs
  • Frequent socket changes
  • Arrow Lake gaming regressions

FAQ: Core Ultra 7 265 vs Core i9-14900K

Which is better, Core Ultra 7 265 or Core i9-14900K? +

Core i9-14900K scores 89 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 61. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Core Ultra 7 265 worth the price? +

At $326, Core Ultra 7 265 delivers a Specdex score of 28 — strongest in passmark.

Is Core i9-14900K worth the price? +

At $589, Core i9-14900K delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in single.

Does Core Ultra 7 265 or Core i9-14900K last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Core Ultra 7 265 or Core i9-14900K? +

Core i9-14900K — more score per dollar ($589 vs $326). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.