Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Core i9-14900K — Raptor Lake Refresh · 24C/32T · 125 W · LGA1700
Intel

Core i9-14900K

Raptor Lake Refresh · 24C/32T · 125 W · LGA1700

89
/ 100
From $589
VS
Core i9-14900K wins by 5
Intel Core Ultra 5 345K — Panther Lake · 14C · 5.5 GHz
Intel

Intel Core Ultra 5 345K

Panther Lake · 14C · 5.5 GHz

84
/ 100
From $329
Specdex verdict

Core i9-14900K takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Core i9-14900K lands at 89 and Intel Core Ultra 5 345K at 84. That puts Core i9-14900K ahead by 5 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Core i9-14900K if…

  • Strong per-core performance
  • Hybrid P/E cores (12th gen+)
  • Wide platform availability

Pick Intel Core Ultra 5 345K if…

  • Latest generation silicon
  • Improved perf-per-watt
  • Full modern feature set
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Gaming

Core i9-14900K

Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed

Core i9-14900K leads on single (91 vs 86).

Creators & productivity

Core i9-14900K

Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count

Core i9-14900K leads on multi (89 vs 84).

Power efficiency

Intel Core Ultra 5 345K

Performance per watt — thermals, PSU headroom, electricity cost

Intel Core Ultra 5 345K leads on efficiency (86 vs 81).

Value for money

Intel Core Ultra 5 345K

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Intel Core Ultra 5 345K more score per dollar ($329 vs $589).

Core i9-14900K 89
vs
84 Intel Core Ultra 5 345K

Score breakdown

Core i9-14900K
89
single 91
multi 89
gaming 88
efficiency 81
Intel Core Ultra 5 345K
84
single 86
multi 84
gaming 85
efficiency 86

Specs side-by-side

Core i9-14900K versus Intel Core Ultra 5 345K — full spec comparison
Spec Core i9-14900K Intel Core Ultra 5 345K
Architecture
Raptor Lake Refresh
Panther Lake
Cores
24
14
Threads
32
TDP
125 W
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1851
Release year
2023
2025

Core i9-14900K

Pros
  • +Strong per-core performance
  • +Hybrid P/E cores (12th gen+)
  • +Wide platform availability
Cons
  • Power draw on top SKUs
  • Frequent socket changes
  • Arrow Lake gaming regressions

Intel Core Ultra 5 345K

Pros
  • +Latest generation silicon
  • +Improved perf-per-watt
  • +Full modern feature set
Cons
  • Premium pricing
  • Requires up-to-date platform
  • Initial stock scarcity likely

FAQ: Core i9-14900K vs Intel Core Ultra 5 345K

Which is better, Core i9-14900K or Intel Core Ultra 5 345K? +

Core i9-14900K scores 89 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 5. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Core i9-14900K worth the price? +

At $589, Core i9-14900K delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in single.

Is Intel Core Ultra 5 345K worth the price? +

At $329, Intel Core Ultra 5 345K delivers a Specdex score of 84 — strongest in single.

Does Core i9-14900K or Intel Core Ultra 5 345K last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for gaming, Core i9-14900K or Intel Core Ultra 5 345K? +

Core i9-14900K — leads on single (91 vs 86). Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed.

Which is better for creator and productivity work, Core i9-14900K or Intel Core Ultra 5 345K? +

Core i9-14900K — leads on multi (89 vs 84). Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count.