Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Core i9-13900KS — 24C/32T · 6.0 GHz · 150 W · PassMark #170
Intel

Core i9-13900KS

24C/32T · 6.0 GHz · 150 W · PassMark #170

33
/ 100
From $521
VS
Core Ultra 9 285K wins by 56
Core Ultra 9 285K — Arrow Lake · 24C · 5.7 GHz · LGA1851
Intel

Core Ultra 9 285K

Arrow Lake · 24C · 5.7 GHz · LGA1851

89
/ 100
From $589
Specdex verdict

Core Ultra 9 285K takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Core i9-13900KS lands at 33 and Core Ultra 9 285K at 89. That puts Core Ultra 9 285K ahead by 56 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Core i9-13900KS if…

  • PassMark #170 of 5,901 — capable workhorse
  • Current PassMark-tracked street price around $521

Pick Core Ultra 9 285K if…

  • Far more efficient than 14900K
  • Strong multi-thread productivity
  • New LGA1851 platform with DDR5-6400
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

Core Ultra 9 285K

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Core Ultra 9 285K more score per dollar ($589 vs $521).

Core i9-13900KS 33
vs
89 Core Ultra 9 285K

Score breakdown

Core i9-13900KS
33
cpu 33
passmark 60485
single 0
multi 0
gaming 0
efficiency 0
Core Ultra 9 285K
89
cpu 0
passmark 0
single 92
multi 94
gaming 85
efficiency 90

Specs side-by-side

Core i9-13900KS versus Core Ultra 9 285K — full spec comparison
Spec Core i9-13900KS Core Ultra 9 285K
Cores
24 (8P + 16E)
24 (8P + 16E)
Threads
32
24
Base clock
3.2 GHz (P) / 2.4 GHz (E)
3.7 GHz
Boost clock
6.0 GHz
5.7 GHz
L3 cache
36 MB
36 MB
TDP
150 W base / 253 W max
125 W (PL1) / 250 W (PL2)
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA1851
Class
Desktop
PassMark rank
#170 of 5,901
PassMark CPU Mark
60,485
Process
TSMC N3B
iGPU
Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG, 4 Xe cores @ 2.0 GHz)
NPU
13 TOPS
Memory
DDR5-6400

Core i9-13900KS

Pros
  • +PassMark #170 of 5,901 — capable workhorse
  • +Current PassMark-tracked street price around $521
Cons
  • Requires recent-generation motherboard and DDR5 memory
  • Newer-generation parts pull ahead in current rankings

Core Ultra 9 285K

Pros
  • +Far more efficient than 14900K
  • +Strong multi-thread productivity
  • +New LGA1851 platform with DDR5-6400
Cons
  • Gaming regresses vs 14900K in some titles
  • No hyper-threading (24 threads from 24 cores)
  • 13 TOPS NPU is modest

FAQ: Core i9-13900KS vs Core Ultra 9 285K

Which is better, Core i9-13900KS or Core Ultra 9 285K? +

Core Ultra 9 285K scores 89 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 56. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Core i9-13900KS worth the price? +

At $521, Core i9-13900KS delivers a Specdex score of 33 — strongest in passmark.

Is Core Ultra 9 285K worth the price? +

At $589, Core Ultra 9 285K delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in multi.

Does Core i9-13900KS or Core Ultra 9 285K last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Core i9-13900KS or Core Ultra 9 285K? +

Core Ultra 9 285K — more score per dollar ($589 vs $521). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.