Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Core i5-14600K — Raptor Lake Refresh · 14C · 5.3 GHz · $319
Intel

Core i5-14600K

Raptor Lake Refresh · 14C · 5.3 GHz · $319

87
/ 100
From $319
VS
Core Ultra 9 285K wins by 2
Core Ultra 9 285K — Arrow Lake · 24C · 5.7 GHz · LGA1851
Intel

Core Ultra 9 285K

Arrow Lake · 24C · 5.7 GHz · LGA1851

89
/ 100
From $589
Specdex verdict

Core Ultra 9 285K takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Core i5-14600K lands at 87 and Core Ultra 9 285K at 89. That puts Core Ultra 9 285K ahead by 2 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Core i5-14600K if…

  • Strong gaming performance
  • Good productivity for price
  • DDR4 and DDR5 compatible

Pick Core Ultra 9 285K if…

  • Far more efficient than 14900K
  • Strong multi-thread productivity
  • New LGA1851 platform with DDR5-6400
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Gaming

Core i5-14600K

Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed

Core i5-14600K leads on gaming (92 vs 85).

Creators & productivity

Core Ultra 9 285K

Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count

Core Ultra 9 285K leads on multi (94 vs 86).

Power efficiency

Core Ultra 9 285K

Performance per watt — thermals, PSU headroom, electricity cost

Core Ultra 9 285K leads on efficiency (90 vs 78).

Value for money

Core i5-14600K

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Core i5-14600K more score per dollar ($319 vs $589).

Core i5-14600K 87
vs
89 Core Ultra 9 285K

Score breakdown

Core i5-14600K
87
single 90
multi 86
gaming 92
efficiency 78
Core Ultra 9 285K
89
single 92
multi 94
gaming 85
efficiency 90

Specs side-by-side

Core i5-14600K versus Core Ultra 9 285K — full spec comparison
Spec Core i5-14600K Core Ultra 9 285K
Cores
14 (6P+8E)
24 (8P + 16E)
Threads
20
24
Boost clock
5.3 GHz
5.7 GHz
TDP
125 W
125 W (PL1) / 250 W (PL2)
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1851
Base clock
3.7 GHz
L3 cache
36 MB
Process
TSMC N3B
iGPU
Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG, 4 Xe cores @ 2.0 GHz)
NPU
13 TOPS
Memory
DDR5-6400

Core i5-14600K

Pros
  • +Strong gaming performance
  • +Good productivity for price
  • +DDR4 and DDR5 compatible
Cons
  • Last-gen LGA1700 socket
  • Power hungry under load
  • No AI instructions

Core Ultra 9 285K

Pros
  • +Far more efficient than 14900K
  • +Strong multi-thread productivity
  • +New LGA1851 platform with DDR5-6400
Cons
  • Gaming regresses vs 14900K in some titles
  • No hyper-threading (24 threads from 24 cores)
  • 13 TOPS NPU is modest

FAQ: Core i5-14600K vs Core Ultra 9 285K

Which is better, Core i5-14600K or Core Ultra 9 285K? +

Core Ultra 9 285K scores 89 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 2. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Core i5-14600K worth the price? +

At $319, Core i5-14600K delivers a Specdex score of 87 — strongest in gaming.

Is Core Ultra 9 285K worth the price? +

At $589, Core Ultra 9 285K delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in multi.

Does Core i5-14600K or Core Ultra 9 285K last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for gaming, Core i5-14600K or Core Ultra 9 285K? +

Core i5-14600K — leads on gaming (92 vs 85). Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed.

Which is better for creator and productivity work, Core i5-14600K or Core Ultra 9 285K? +

Core Ultra 9 285K — leads on multi (94 vs 86). Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count.