Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro — Prime/Zoom
Canon

Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro

Prime/Zoom

86
/ 100
From $499
VS
Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM wins by 10
Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM — Full-frame · 950 g · Pro portrait
Canon

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Full-frame · 950 g · Pro portrait

96
/ 100
From $2,299
Specdex verdict

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro lands at 86 and Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM at 96. That puts Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM ahead by 10 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro if…

  • Fast aperture
  • Quiet autofocus
  • Weather-sealed (most)

Pick Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM if…

  • Breathtaking bokeh
  • Sharp wide open
  • Weather-sealed L build
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Compared on the build sub-score

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM leads on build (98 vs 88).

Sharpness

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM leads on sharpness (98 vs 86).

Autofocus

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM leads on af (94 vs 84).

Value for money

Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro more score per dollar ($499 vs $2,299).

Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro 86
vs
96 Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Score breakdown

Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro
86
sharpness 86
af 84
build 88
value 85
Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM
96
sharpness 98
af 94
build 98
value 82

Specs side-by-side

Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro versus Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM — full spec comparison
Spec Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM
Mount
Canon RF
Aperture
f/1.2
Weight
950 g
Filter size
77 mm

Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro

Pros
  • +Fast aperture
  • +Quiet autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed (most)
Cons
  • Mount-specific
  • Weight varies
  • Price scales with quality

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Pros
  • +Breathtaking bokeh
  • +Sharp wide open
  • +Weather-sealed L build
Cons
  • Heavy at 950 g
  • Expensive
  • Breathing present

FAQ: Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro vs Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Which is better, Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro or Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM? +

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM scores 96 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 10. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro worth the price? +

At $499, Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in build.

Is Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM worth the price? +

At $2,299, Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM delivers a Specdex score of 96 — strongest in sharpness.

Does Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro or Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for build, Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro or Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM? +

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM — leads on build (98 vs 88). Compared on the build sub-score.

Which is better for sharpness, Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro or Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM? +

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM — leads on sharpness (98 vs 86). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.