Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM — Prime/Zoom
Canon

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM

Prime/Zoom

96
/ 100
From $2,999
VS
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM wins by 10
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro — Prime/Zoom
Canon

Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro

Prime/Zoom

86
/ 100
From $499
Specdex verdict

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM lands at 96 and Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro at 86. That puts Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM ahead by 10 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM if…

  • ✓Fast autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed
  • ✓Premium optics

Pick Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro if…

  • ✓Fast aperture
  • ✓Quiet autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed (most)
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Sharpness

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM leads on sharpness (96 vs 86).

Build

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM

Compared on the build sub-score

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM leads on build (94 vs 88).

Autofocus

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM leads on af (95 vs 84).

Value for money

Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro more score per dollar ($499 vs $2,999).

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM 96
vs
86 Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro

Score breakdown

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM
96
sharpness 96
af 95
build 94
value 84
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro
86
sharpness 86
af 84
build 88
value 85

Specs side-by-side

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM versus Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro — full spec comparison
Spec Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Expensive
  • −Focus breathing varies

Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro

Pros
  • +Fast aperture
  • +Quiet autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed (most)
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Weight varies
  • −Price scales with quality

FAQ: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM vs Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro

Which is better, Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM or Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro? +

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM scores 96 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 10. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM worth the price? +

At $2,999, Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM delivers a Specdex score of 96 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro worth the price? +

At $499, Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in build.

Does Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM or Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for sharpness, Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM or Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro? +

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM — leads on sharpness (96 vs 86). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.

Which is better for build, Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM or Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro? +

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM — leads on build (94 vs 88). Compared on the build sub-score.