Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM — Prime/Zoom
Canon

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Prime/Zoom

93
/ 100
From $2,299
VS
Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II wins by 3
Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II — GM II · 1045g · OIS · L-Series benchmark
Sony

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II

GM II · 1045g · OIS · L-Series benchmark

96
/ 100
From $2,799
Specdex verdict

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM lands at 93 and Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II at 96. That puts Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM if…

  • ✓Fast autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed
  • ✓Premium optics

Pick Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II if…

  • ✓29% lighter than original 70-200 GM
  • ✓Industry-best AF with linear motors
  • ✓Excellent close focus
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Autofocus

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II leads on af (100 vs 92).

Build

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II

Compared on the build sub-score

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II leads on build (96 vs 94).

Sharpness

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II leads on sharpness (96 vs 93).

Value for money

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM more score per dollar ($2,299 vs $2,799).

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 93
vs
96 Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II

Score breakdown

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM
93
sharpness 93
af 92
build 94
value 84
stabilization 0
Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II
96
sharpness 96
af 100
build 96
value 84
stabilization 92

Specs side-by-side

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM versus Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II — full spec comparison
Spec Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II
Mount
—
Sony E
Focal length
—
70-200 mm
Aperture
—
f/2.8
Construction
—
17 elements / 14 groups
Stabilization
—
OSS
Min focus
—
0.40 m (wide) / 0.82 m (tele)
Filter
—
77 mm
Weight
—
1045 g

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Expensive
  • −Focus breathing varies

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II

Pros
  • +29% lighter than original 70-200 GM
  • +Industry-best AF with linear motors
  • +Excellent close focus
Cons
  • −Premium pricing
  • −Heavy at 1045g
  • −External zoom changes balance

FAQ: Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM vs Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II

Which is better, Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM or Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II? +

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II scores 96 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM worth the price? +

At $2,299, Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in build.

Is Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II worth the price? +

At $2,799, Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II delivers a Specdex score of 96 — strongest in af.

Does Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM or Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for autofocus, Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM or Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II? +

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II — leads on af (100 vs 92). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.

Which is better for build, Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM or Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II? +

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II — leads on build (96 vs 94). Compared on the build sub-score.