Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Canon EOS R5 Mark II — 45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection
Canon

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection

95
/ 100
From $4,299
VS
Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit — full-frame · 2024
Sony

Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit

full-frame · 2024

95
/ 100
From $7,348
Specdex verdict

Dead heat — it comes down to priorities.

In our weighted Specdex score, Canon EOS R5 Mark II lands at 95 and Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit at 95. With scores tied, the decision hinges on which sub-scores matter most to you.

Pick Canon EOS R5 Mark II if…

  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • Up to 30 fps electronic burst

Pick Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit if…

  • Current-gen AF system
  • Proven lens ecosystem
  • Strong video + stills balance
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photo

Tie

Compared on the photo sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Autofocus

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on autofocus (98 vs 93).

Video

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the video sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on video (96 vs 91).

Value for money

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Canon EOS R5 Mark II more score per dollar ($4,299 vs $7,348).

Canon EOS R5 Mark II 95
vs
95 Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit

Score breakdown

Canon EOS R5 Mark II
95
photo 96
video 96
autofocus 98
ergonomics 92
Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit
95
photo 95
video 91
autofocus 93
ergonomics 86

Specs side-by-side

Canon EOS R5 Mark II versus Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit — full spec comparison
Spec Canon EOS R5 Mark II Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit
Sensor
45 MP BSI stacked CMOS
Mount
Canon RF
Burst
12 fps mechanical / 30 fps electronic
Video
8K 60p RAW · 4K 120p
AF
5,850 user-selectable points, 100% coverage
ISO
100–51200 (exp. 50–102400)
Stabilization
5-axis IBIS
Format
full-frame
Release year
2024

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Pros
  • +8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • +Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • +Up to 30 fps electronic burst
Cons
  • Price jumped from R5
  • Body heats in extended 8K recording
  • Battery life modest

Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit

Pros
  • +Current-gen AF system
  • +Proven lens ecosystem
  • +Strong video + stills balance
Cons
  • Body price excludes lens
  • Heavy for travel (flagship)
  • Learning curve on menus

FAQ: Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit

Which is better, Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit? +

Both score 95 on our weighted rubric — tied. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Canon EOS R5 Mark II worth the price? +

At $4,299, Canon EOS R5 Mark II delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in autofocus.

Is Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit worth the price? +

At $7,348, Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in photo.

Does Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for autofocus, Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on autofocus (98 vs 93). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.

Which is better for video, Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Sony A9 III · with 24-70mm kit · with dual-battery kit? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on video (96 vs 91). Compared on the video sub-score.