Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Canon EOS R5 Mark II — 45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection
Canon

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection

95
/ 100
From $4,299
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II wins by 11
Sony A7R III — full-frame · 2017
Sony

Sony A7R III

full-frame · 2017

84
/ 100
From $3,199
Specdex verdict

Canon EOS R5 Mark II takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Canon EOS R5 Mark II lands at 95 and Sony A7R III at 84. That puts Canon EOS R5 Mark II ahead by 11 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Canon EOS R5 Mark II if…

  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • Up to 30 fps electronic burst

Pick Sony A7R III if…

  • Mature system, great used market
  • Proven lens lineup
  • Often on sale
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photo

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the photo sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on photo (96 vs 84).

Autofocus

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on autofocus (98 vs 80).

Ergonomics

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the ergonomics sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on ergonomics (92 vs 86).

Value for money

Sony A7R III

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Sony A7R III more score per dollar ($3,199 vs $4,299).

Canon EOS R5 Mark II 95
vs
84 Sony A7R III

Score breakdown

Canon EOS R5 Mark II
95
photo 96
video 96
autofocus 98
ergonomics 92
Sony A7R III
84
photo 84
video 76
autofocus 80
ergonomics 86

Specs side-by-side

Canon EOS R5 Mark II versus Sony A7R III — full spec comparison
Spec Canon EOS R5 Mark II Sony A7R III
Sensor
45 MP BSI stacked CMOS
Mount
Canon RF
Burst
12 fps mechanical / 30 fps electronic
Video
8K 60p RAW · 4K 120p
AF
5,850 user-selectable points, 100% coverage
ISO
100–51200 (exp. 50–102400)
Stabilization
5-axis IBIS
Format
full-frame
Release year
2017

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Pros
  • +8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • +Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • +Up to 30 fps electronic burst
Cons
  • Price jumped from R5
  • Body heats in extended 8K recording
  • Battery life modest

Sony A7R III

Pros
  • +Mature system, great used market
  • +Proven lens lineup
  • +Often on sale
Cons
  • Older AF system
  • Heavier than modern mirrorless
  • Firmware updates trailed off

FAQ: Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Sony A7R III

Which is better, Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Sony A7R III? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 11. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Canon EOS R5 Mark II worth the price? +

At $4,299, Canon EOS R5 Mark II delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in autofocus.

Is Sony A7R III worth the price? +

At $3,199, Sony A7R III delivers a Specdex score of 84 — strongest in ergonomics.

Does Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Sony A7R III last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for photo, Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Sony A7R III? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on photo (96 vs 84). Compared on the photo sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Sony A7R III? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on autofocus (98 vs 80). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.