Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Canon EOS R5 Mark II — 45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection
Canon

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection

95
/ 100
From $4,299
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II wins by 3
Fujifilm X100VI — 40 MP · Fixed 23 mm f/2 · IBIS
Fujifilm

Fujifilm X100VI

40 MP · Fixed 23 mm f/2 · IBIS

92
/ 100
From $1,599
Specdex verdict

Canon EOS R5 Mark II takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Canon EOS R5 Mark II lands at 95 and Fujifilm X100VI at 92. That puts Canon EOS R5 Mark II ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Canon EOS R5 Mark II if…

  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • Up to 30 fps electronic burst

Pick Fujifilm X100VI if…

  • Viral for a reason — gorgeous JPEGs out of camera
  • Compact with IBIS
  • Hybrid OVF/EVF
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photo

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the photo sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on photo (96 vs 94).

Ergonomics

Fujifilm X100VI

Compared on the ergonomics sub-score

Fujifilm X100VI leads on ergonomics (96 vs 92).

Video

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the video sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on video (96 vs 84).

Value for money

Fujifilm X100VI

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Fujifilm X100VI more score per dollar ($1,599 vs $4,299).

Canon EOS R5 Mark II 95
vs
92 Fujifilm X100VI

Score breakdown

Canon EOS R5 Mark II
95
photo 96
video 96
autofocus 98
ergonomics 92
Fujifilm X100VI
92
photo 94
video 84
autofocus 82
ergonomics 96

Specs side-by-side

Canon EOS R5 Mark II versus Fujifilm X100VI — full spec comparison
Spec Canon EOS R5 Mark II Fujifilm X100VI
Sensor
45 MP BSI stacked CMOS
40 MP X-Trans 5 HR APS-C
Mount
Canon RF
Burst
12 fps mechanical / 30 fps electronic
Video
8K 60p RAW · 4K 120p
AF
5,850 user-selectable points, 100% coverage
ISO
100–51200 (exp. 50–102400)
Stabilization
5-axis IBIS
6-stop IBIS
Lens
Fixed 23 mm f/2 (35 mm equiv)

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Pros
  • +8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • +Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • +Up to 30 fps electronic burst
Cons
  • Price jumped from R5
  • Body heats in extended 8K recording
  • Battery life modest

Fujifilm X100VI

Pros
  • +Viral for a reason — gorgeous JPEGs out of camera
  • +Compact with IBIS
  • +Hybrid OVF/EVF
Cons
  • Fixed lens (not for everyone)
  • Severe supply issues
  • AF still behind Sony

FAQ: Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Fujifilm X100VI

Which is better, Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Fujifilm X100VI? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Canon EOS R5 Mark II worth the price? +

At $4,299, Canon EOS R5 Mark II delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in autofocus.

Is Fujifilm X100VI worth the price? +

At $1,599, Fujifilm X100VI delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in ergonomics.

Does Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Fujifilm X100VI last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for photo, Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Fujifilm X100VI? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on photo (96 vs 94). Compared on the photo sub-score.

Which is better for ergonomics, Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Fujifilm X100VI? +

Fujifilm X100VI — leads on ergonomics (96 vs 92). Compared on the ergonomics sub-score.