Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only — full-frame · 2022
Canon

Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only

full-frame · 2022

91
/ 100
From $2,499
VS
Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only wins by 7
Sony A7R III — full-frame · 2017
Sony

Sony A7R III

full-frame · 2017

84
/ 100
From $3,199
Specdex verdict

Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only lands at 91 and Sony A7R III at 84. That puts Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only ahead by 7 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only if…

  • Current-gen AF system
  • Proven lens ecosystem
  • Strong video + stills balance

Pick Sony A7R III if…

  • Mature system, great used market
  • Proven lens lineup
  • Often on sale
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photo

Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only

Compared on the photo sub-score

Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only leads on photo (91 vs 84).

Ergonomics

Tie

Compared on the ergonomics sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Autofocus

Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only leads on autofocus (89 vs 80).

Value for money

Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only more score per dollar ($2,499 vs $3,199).

Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only 91
vs
84 Sony A7R III

Score breakdown

Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only
91
photo 91
video 87
autofocus 89
ergonomics 86
Sony A7R III
84
photo 84
video 76
autofocus 80
ergonomics 86

Specs side-by-side

Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only versus Sony A7R III — full spec comparison
Spec Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only Sony A7R III
Format
full-frame
full-frame
Release year
2022
2017

Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only

Pros
  • +Current-gen AF system
  • +Proven lens ecosystem
  • +Strong video + stills balance
Cons
  • Body price excludes lens
  • Heavy for travel (flagship)
  • Learning curve on menus

Sony A7R III

Pros
  • +Mature system, great used market
  • +Proven lens lineup
  • +Often on sale
Cons
  • Older AF system
  • Heavier than modern mirrorless
  • Firmware updates trailed off

FAQ: Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only vs Sony A7R III

Which is better, Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only or Sony A7R III? +

Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only scores 91 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 7. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only worth the price? +

At $2,499, Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in photo.

Is Sony A7R III worth the price? +

At $3,199, Sony A7R III delivers a Specdex score of 84 — strongest in ergonomics.

Does Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only or Sony A7R III last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for photo, Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only or Sony A7R III? +

Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only — leads on photo (91 vs 84). Compared on the photo sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only or Sony A7R III? +

Canon EOS R6 Mark II · Body only — leads on autofocus (89 vs 80). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.