Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Canon EOS R5 Mark II — full-frame · 2024
Canon

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

full-frame · 2024

95
/ 100
From $4,299
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II wins by 1
Sony α9 III — Global shutter · 24.6 MP · 120fps
Sony

Sony α9 III

Global shutter · 24.6 MP · 120fps

94
/ 100
From $5,999
Specdex verdict

Canon EOS R5 Mark II takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Canon EOS R5 Mark II lands at 95 and Sony α9 III at 94. That puts Canon EOS R5 Mark II ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Canon EOS R5 Mark II if…

  • Current-gen AF system
  • Proven lens ecosystem
  • Strong video + stills balance

Pick Sony α9 III if…

  • First full-frame global-shutter camera
  • 120 fps at full resolution (14-bit RAW)
  • Sync flash to any shutter speed up to 1/80000 s
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Video

Tie

Compared on the video sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Ergonomics

Sony α9 III

Compared on the ergonomics sub-score

Sony α9 III leads on ergonomics (92 vs 86).

Value for money

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Canon EOS R5 Mark II more score per dollar ($4,299 vs $5,999).

Canon EOS R5 Mark II 95
vs
94 Sony α9 III

Score breakdown

Canon EOS R5 Mark II
95
photo 95
video 91
autofocus 93
ergonomics 86
sensor 0
af 0
build 0
Sony α9 III
94
photo 0
video 92
autofocus 0
ergonomics 92
sensor 92
af 100
build 92

Specs side-by-side

Canon EOS R5 Mark II versus Sony α9 III — full spec comparison
Spec Canon EOS R5 Mark II Sony α9 III
Format
full-frame
Release year
2024
Sensor
24.6 MP global-shutter CMOS
Mount
Sony E
Max shutter
1/80000 s electronic
Burst
Up to 120 fps full-res JPG / 14-bit RAW
Video
Up to 4K (3840×2160) at 120 fps
AF
759 phase-detect points (still) / 627 (video)
ISO
ISO 250–25600 native (125–51200 extended)
Weight
702 g (with battery + card)

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Pros
  • +Current-gen AF system
  • +Proven lens ecosystem
  • +Strong video + stills balance
Cons
  • Body price excludes lens
  • Heavy for travel (flagship)
  • Learning curve on menus

Sony α9 III

Pros
  • +First full-frame global-shutter camera
  • +120 fps at full resolution (14-bit RAW)
  • +Sync flash to any shutter speed up to 1/80000 s
Cons
  • 24.6 MP feels conservative for the price
  • $5,999 body-only
  • ISO range tops at 25600 native

FAQ: Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Sony α9 III

Which is better, Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Sony α9 III? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Canon EOS R5 Mark II worth the price? +

At $4,299, Canon EOS R5 Mark II delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in photo.

Is Sony α9 III worth the price? +

At $5,999, Sony α9 III delivers a Specdex score of 94 — strongest in af.

Does Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Sony α9 III last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for ergonomics, Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Sony α9 III? +

Sony α9 III — leads on ergonomics (92 vs 86). Compared on the ergonomics sub-score.

Which is the better value, Canon EOS R5 Mark II or Sony α9 III? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — more score per dollar ($4,299 vs $5,999). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.