Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip — full-frame · 2024
Canon

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip

full-frame · 2024

95
/ 100
From $4,599
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip wins by 3
Sony Alpha 7 IV — 33 MP full-frame · 4K60 · Hybrid
Sony

Sony Alpha 7 IV

33 MP full-frame · 4K60 · Hybrid

92
/ 100
From $2,498
Specdex verdict

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip lands at 95 and Sony Alpha 7 IV at 92. That puts Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip if…

  • Current-gen AF system
  • Proven lens ecosystem
  • Strong video + stills balance

Pick Sony Alpha 7 IV if…

  • Great hybrid stills + video
  • Excellent AF with Real-time Tracking
  • Dual card slots
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photo

Tie

Compared on the photo sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Autofocus

Sony Alpha 7 IV

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Sony Alpha 7 IV leads on autofocus (96 vs 93).

Video

Tie

Compared on the video sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Value for money

Sony Alpha 7 IV

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Sony Alpha 7 IV more score per dollar ($2,498 vs $4,599).

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip 95
vs
92 Sony Alpha 7 IV

Score breakdown

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip
95
photo 95
video 91
autofocus 93
ergonomics 86
Sony Alpha 7 IV
92
photo 94
video 90
autofocus 96
ergonomics 88

Specs side-by-side

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip versus Sony Alpha 7 IV — full spec comparison
Spec Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip Sony Alpha 7 IV
Format
full-frame
Release year
2024
Sensor
33 MP Exmor R CMOS
Mount
Sony E
Video
4K60 (Super35), 4K30 full-frame
Stabilization
5-axis IBIS

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip

Pros
  • +Current-gen AF system
  • +Proven lens ecosystem
  • +Strong video + stills balance
Cons
  • Body price excludes lens
  • Heavy for travel (flagship)
  • Learning curve on menus

Sony Alpha 7 IV

Pros
  • +Great hybrid stills + video
  • +Excellent AF with Real-time Tracking
  • +Dual card slots
Cons
  • 4K60 is Super 35 crop
  • Menus still dense
  • Heats with long 4K recording

FAQ: Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip vs Sony Alpha 7 IV

Which is better, Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip or Sony Alpha 7 IV? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip worth the price? +

At $4,599, Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in photo.

Is Sony Alpha 7 IV worth the price? +

At $2,498, Sony Alpha 7 IV delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in autofocus.

Does Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip or Sony Alpha 7 IV last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for autofocus, Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip or Sony Alpha 7 IV? +

Sony Alpha 7 IV — leads on autofocus (96 vs 93). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.

Which is the better value, Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only · with battery grip or Sony Alpha 7 IV? +

Sony Alpha 7 IV — more score per dollar ($2,498 vs $4,599). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.