Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip — full-frame · 2021
Canon

Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip

full-frame · 2021

93
/ 100
From $6,299
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II wins by 2
Canon EOS R5 Mark II — 45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection
Canon

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection

95
/ 100
From $4,299
Specdex verdict

Canon EOS R5 Mark II takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip lands at 93 and Canon EOS R5 Mark II at 95. That puts Canon EOS R5 Mark II ahead by 2 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip if…

  • Current-gen AF system
  • Proven lens ecosystem
  • Strong video + stills balance

Pick Canon EOS R5 Mark II if…

  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • Up to 30 fps electronic burst
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photo

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the photo sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on photo (96 vs 93).

Autofocus

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on autofocus (98 vs 91).

Video

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the video sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on video (96 vs 89).

Value for money

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Canon EOS R5 Mark II more score per dollar ($4,299 vs $6,299).

Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip 93
vs
95 Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Score breakdown

Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip
93
photo 93
video 89
autofocus 91
ergonomics 86
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
95
photo 96
video 96
autofocus 98
ergonomics 92

Specs side-by-side

Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip versus Canon EOS R5 Mark II — full spec comparison
Spec Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Format
full-frame
Release year
2021
Sensor
45 MP BSI stacked CMOS
Mount
Canon RF
Burst
12 fps mechanical / 30 fps electronic
Video
8K 60p RAW · 4K 120p
AF
5,850 user-selectable points, 100% coverage
ISO
100–51200 (exp. 50–102400)
Stabilization
5-axis IBIS

Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip

Pros
  • +Current-gen AF system
  • +Proven lens ecosystem
  • +Strong video + stills balance
Cons
  • Body price excludes lens
  • Heavy for travel (flagship)
  • Learning curve on menus

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Pros
  • +8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • +Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • +Up to 30 fps electronic burst
Cons
  • Price jumped from R5
  • Body heats in extended 8K recording
  • Battery life modest

FAQ: Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip vs Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Which is better, Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 2. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip worth the price? +

At $6,299, Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in photo.

Is Canon EOS R5 Mark II worth the price? +

At $4,299, Canon EOS R5 Mark II delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in autofocus.

Does Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip or Canon EOS R5 Mark II last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for photo, Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on photo (96 vs 93). Compared on the photo sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Canon EOS R3 · with battery grip or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on autofocus (98 vs 91). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.