Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM — Prime/zoom
Canon

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM

Prime/zoom

92
/ 100
From $2,099
VS
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM wins by 6
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro — Prime/Zoom
Canon

Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro

Prime/Zoom

86
/ 100
From $499
Specdex verdict

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM lands at 92 and Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro at 86. That puts Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM ahead by 6 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM if…

  • ✓Proven optical formula
  • ✓Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • ✓Strong resale

Pick Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro if…

  • ✓Fast aperture
  • ✓Quiet autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed (most)
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Sharpness

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM leads on sharpness (92 vs 86).

Build

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM

Compared on the build sub-score

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM leads on build (90 vs 88).

Autofocus

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM leads on af (88 vs 84).

Value for money

Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro more score per dollar ($499 vs $2,099).

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM 92
vs
86 Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro

Score breakdown

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM
92
sharpness 92
af 88
build 90
value 86
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro
86
sharpness 86
af 84
build 88
value 85

Specs side-by-side

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM versus Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro — full spec comparison
Spec Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM

Pros
  • +Proven optical formula
  • +Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • +Strong resale
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Older AF motor on some
  • −Heavier than modern counterparts

Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro

Pros
  • +Fast aperture
  • +Quiet autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed (most)
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Weight varies
  • −Price scales with quality

FAQ: Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM vs Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro

Which is better, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM or Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro? +

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM scores 92 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 6. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM worth the price? +

At $2,099, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro worth the price? +

At $499, Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in build.

Does Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM or Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for sharpness, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM or Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro? +

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM — leads on sharpness (92 vs 86). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.

Which is better for build, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM or Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro? +

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM — leads on build (90 vs 88). Compared on the build sub-score.