Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM — Prime/zoom
Canon

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM

Prime/zoom

90
/ 100
From $2,199
VS
Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art wins by 1
Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art — Prime/Zoom
Sigma

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Prime/Zoom

91
/ 100
From $1,499
Specdex verdict

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM lands at 90 and Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art at 91. That puts Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM if…

  • ✓Proven optical formula
  • ✓Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • ✓Strong resale

Pick Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art if…

  • ✓Fast autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed
  • ✓Premium optics
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Compared on the build sub-score

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art leads on build (94 vs 90).

Sharpness

Tie

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Autofocus

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art leads on af (90 vs 86).

Value for money

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art more score per dollar ($1,499 vs $2,199).

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM 90
vs
91 Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Score breakdown

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM
90
sharpness 90
af 86
build 90
value 86
Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art
91
sharpness 91
af 90
build 94
value 84

Specs side-by-side

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM versus Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art — full spec comparison
Spec Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM

Pros
  • +Proven optical formula
  • +Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • +Strong resale
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Older AF motor on some
  • −Heavier than modern counterparts

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Expensive
  • −Focus breathing varies

FAQ: Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM vs Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Which is better, Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM or Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art? +

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art scores 91 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM worth the price? +

At $2,199, Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art worth the price? +

At $1,499, Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in build.

Does Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM or Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for build, Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM or Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art? +

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art — leads on build (94 vs 90). Compared on the build sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM or Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art? +

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art — leads on af (90 vs 86). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.