Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM — Prime/zoom
Canon

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM

Prime/zoom

90
/ 100
From $2,199
VS
Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S wins by 5
Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S — S-Line · f/1.2 · Premium glass
Nikon

Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S

S-Line · f/1.2 · Premium glass

95
/ 100
From $2,099
Specdex verdict

Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM lands at 90 and Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S at 95. That puts Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S ahead by 5 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM if…

  • Proven optical formula
  • Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • Strong resale

Pick Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S if…

  • Best 50mm f/1.2 AF lens we've tested
  • Internal focus + silent STM
  • Edge-to-edge sharpness wide open
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM 90
vs
95 Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S

Score breakdown

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM
90
sharpness 90
af 86
build 90
value 86
bokeh 0
Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S
95
sharpness 98
af 95
build 96
value 80
bokeh 96

Specs side-by-side

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM versus Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S — full spec comparison
Spec Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S
Mount
Nikon Z
Focal length
50 mm
Aperture
f/1.2 to f/16
Construction
17 elements / 15 groups
Min focus
0.45 m
Filter
82 mm
Weight
1090 g

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM

Pros
  • +Proven optical formula
  • +Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • +Strong resale
Cons
  • Mount-specific
  • Older AF motor on some
  • Heavier than modern counterparts

Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S

Pros
  • +Best 50mm f/1.2 AF lens we've tested
  • +Internal focus + silent STM
  • +Edge-to-edge sharpness wide open
Cons
  • Heavy at 1090g
  • Pricey
  • Massive front element (filter 82mm)

FAQ: Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM vs Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S

Which is better, Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM or Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S? +

Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 5. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM worth the price? +

At $2,199, Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S worth the price? +

At $2,099, Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in sharpness.

Does Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM or Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.