Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM — Prime/zoom
Canon

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM

Prime/zoom

90
/ 100
From $2,199
VS
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM wins by 1
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM — Prime/zoom
Canon

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM

Prime/zoom

91
/ 100
From $1,899
Specdex verdict

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM lands at 90 and Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM at 91. That puts Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM if…

  • ✓Proven optical formula
  • ✓Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • ✓Strong resale

Pick Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM if…

  • ✓Proven optical formula
  • ✓Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • ✓Strong resale
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Sharpness

Tie

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Build

Tie

Compared on the build sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Autofocus

Tie

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Value for money

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM more score per dollar ($1,899 vs $2,199).

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM 90
vs
91 Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM

Score breakdown

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM
90
sharpness 90
af 86
build 90
value 86
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM
91
sharpness 91
af 87
build 90
value 86

Specs side-by-side

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM versus Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM — full spec comparison
Spec Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM

Pros
  • +Proven optical formula
  • +Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • +Strong resale
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Older AF motor on some
  • −Heavier than modern counterparts

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM

Pros
  • +Proven optical formula
  • +Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • +Strong resale
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Older AF motor on some
  • −Heavier than modern counterparts

FAQ: Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM vs Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM

Which is better, Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM or Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM? +

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM scores 91 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM worth the price? +

At $2,199, Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM worth the price? +

At $1,899, Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in sharpness.

Does Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM or Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM or Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM? +

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM — more score per dollar ($1,899 vs $2,199). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.