Asustor
Asustor AS6704T
NAS · $699
85
/ 100
From $699
VS
Synology DS923+ wins by 5
Synology
Synology DS923+
NAS · $599
90
/ 100
From $599
Specdex verdict
Synology DS923+ takes it — here’s why.
In our weighted Specdex score, Asustor AS6704T lands at 85 and Synology DS923+ at 90. That puts Synology DS923+ ahead by 5 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.
Pick Asustor AS6704T if…
- ✓Rich software ecosystem (Synology/QNAP)
- ✓NVMe cache slots on newer models
- ✓Docker/VM support on higher tiers
Pick Synology DS923+ if…
- ✓Rich software ecosystem (Synology/QNAP)
- ✓NVMe cache slots on newer models
- ✓Docker/VM support on higher tiers
Asustor AS6704T 85
vs 90 Synology DS923+
Score breakdown
Asustor AS6704T
85 performance 85
features 85
software 83
value 82
Synology DS923+
90 performance 90
features 90
software 88
value 82
Specs side-by-side
| Spec | Asustor AS6704T | Synology DS923+ |
|---|
Asustor AS6704T
Pros
- +Rich software ecosystem (Synology/QNAP)
- +NVMe cache slots on newer models
- +Docker/VM support on higher tiers
Cons
- −Disks rarely included
- −Drive compatibility restrictions on some brands
- −Power draw 24/7
Synology DS923+
Pros
- +Rich software ecosystem (Synology/QNAP)
- +NVMe cache slots on newer models
- +Docker/VM support on higher tiers
Cons
- −Disks rarely included
- −Drive compatibility restrictions on some brands
- −Power draw 24/7
FAQ: Asustor AS6704T vs Synology DS923+
Which is better, Asustor AS6704T or Synology DS923+? +
Synology DS923+ scores 90 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 5. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.
Is Asustor AS6704T worth the price? +
At $699, Asustor AS6704T delivers a Specdex score of 85 — strongest in performance.
Is Synology DS923+ worth the price? +
At $599, Synology DS923+ delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in performance.
Does Asustor AS6704T or Synology DS923+ last longer? +
Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.