Skip to content
Specdex
ASUS

ASUS RT-BE96U

Wi-Fi 7 BE19000 · Quad-band · 10 GbE

93
/ 100
From $699
VS
ASUS RT-BE96U wins by 5
TP-Link

TP-Link Deco BE85 (2-pack)

Wi-Fi 7 · Tri-band mesh · 10 GbE × 2

88
/ 100
From $1,099
Specdex verdict

ASUS RT-BE96U takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, ASUS RT-BE96U lands at 93 and TP-Link Deco BE85 (2-pack) at 88. That puts ASUS RT-BE96U ahead by 5 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick ASUS RT-BE96U if…

  • Dual 10 GbE ports
  • AiMesh support
  • VPN Fusion

Pick TP-Link Deco BE85 (2-pack) if…

  • Dual 10 GbE per node
  • Tri-band Wi-Fi 7
  • Excellent coverage

Score breakdown

ASUS RT-BE96U
93
throughput 94
range 92
features 96
value 84
TP-Link Deco BE85 (2-pack)
88
throughput 92
range 90
features 90
value 86

Specs side-by-side

Spec
ASUS RT-BE96U
TP-Link Deco BE85 (2-pack)
Standard
Wi-Fi 7 (BE19000)
Wi-Fi 7 (BE22000)
Bands
Quad-band
Tri-band
Ports
2× 10 GbE + 4× 2.5 GbE
2× 10 GbE + 2× 2.5 GbE per node
Antennas
8 external

ASUS RT-BE96U

Pros
  • +Dual 10 GbE ports
  • +AiMesh support
  • +VPN Fusion
Cons
  • Large
  • Pricey
  • Firmware learning curve

TP-Link Deco BE85 (2-pack)

Pros
  • +Dual 10 GbE per node
  • +Tri-band Wi-Fi 7
  • +Excellent coverage
Cons
  • HomeShield subscription
  • Slightly less range than eero
  • UI dated

FAQ: ASUS RT-BE96U vs TP-Link Deco BE85 (2-pack)

Which is better, ASUS RT-BE96U or TP-Link Deco BE85 (2-pack)? +

ASUS RT-BE96U scores 93 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 5. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is ASUS RT-BE96U worth the price? +

At $699, ASUS RT-BE96U delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in features.

Is TP-Link Deco BE85 (2-pack) worth the price? +

At $1,099, TP-Link Deco BE85 (2-pack) delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in throughput.

Does ASUS RT-BE96U or TP-Link Deco BE85 (2-pack) last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.