Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM — 32″ 4K QD-OLED · 240Hz · DisplayPort 2.1
ASUS

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM

32″ 4K QD-OLED · 240Hz · DisplayPort 2.1

95
/ 100
From $1,299
VS
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM wins by 3
Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) — 49″ Dual-QHD · Curved · QD-OLED
Samsung

Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)

49″ Dual-QHD · Curved · QD-OLED

92
/ 100
From $2,199
Specdex verdict

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM lands at 95 and Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) at 92. That puts ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM if…

  • ✓4K 240Hz OLED
  • ✓DP 2.1 UHBR20
  • ✓Excellent HDR

Pick Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) if…

  • ✓49″ ultrawide with QD-OLED
  • ✓1800R curve
  • ✓240 Hz native
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Picture quality

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM

Color accuracy and HDR performance

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM leads on hdr (94 vs 90).

Value for money

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM more score per dollar ($1,299 vs $2,199).

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 95
vs
92 Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)

Score breakdown

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM
95
color 96
motion 98
hdr 94
features 94
display 0
gaming 0
ergonomics 0
value 0
Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)
92
color 0
motion 95
hdr 90
features 0
display 95
gaming 96
ergonomics 80
value 84

Specs side-by-side

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM versus Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) — full spec comparison
Spec ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)
Panel
QD-OLED
—
Resolution
3840×2160
▲ 5120×1440
Refresh
240Hz
—
Response time
0.03 ms GtG
—
Connectivity
DP 2.1, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 90W PD
2× HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4, USB hub
Display
—
49″ QD-OLED, 1800R
Refresh rate
—
240 Hz
HDR
—
DisplayHDR True Black 400

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM

Pros
  • +4K 240Hz OLED
  • +DP 2.1 UHBR20
  • +Excellent HDR
Cons
  • −Burn-in risk (mitigated)
  • −Expensive
  • −OLED pixel-shift artifacts

Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)

Pros
  • +49″ ultrawide with QD-OLED
  • +1800R curve
  • +240 Hz native
Cons
  • −Massive desk footprint
  • −No DisplayPort 2.1
  • −Auto-brightness limits HDR

FAQ: ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)

Which is better, ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM or Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)? +

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM worth the price? +

At $1,299, ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in motion.

Is Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) worth the price? +

At $2,199, Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in gaming.

Does ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM or Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for picture quality, ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM or Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)? +

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM — leads on hdr (94 vs 90). Color accuracy and HDR performance.

Which is the better value, ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM or Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)? +

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM — more score per dollar ($1,299 vs $2,199). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.