Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Apple Watch Ultra 3 — S10 chip · 49 mm titanium · 3000 nits
Apple

Apple Watch Ultra 3

S10 chip · 49 mm titanium · 3000 nits

94
/ 100
From $799
VS
Apple Watch Ultra 3 wins by 5
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra — Exynos W1000 · Titanium · 100 m WR
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra

Exynos W1000 · Titanium · 100 m WR

89
/ 100
From $649
Specdex verdict

Apple Watch Ultra 3 takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Apple Watch Ultra 3 lands at 94 and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra at 89. That puts Apple Watch Ultra 3 ahead by 5 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Apple Watch Ultra 3 if…

  • 49 mm titanium chassis
  • 3000 nit peak display
  • Up to 42 hours normal use

Pick Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra if…

  • 100 m water resistance
  • Multi-band GPS L1+L5
  • Sapphire glass + titanium case
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Durability

Tie

Compared on the durability sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Display

Apple Watch Ultra 3

Compared on the display sub-score

Apple Watch Ultra 3 leads on display (96 vs 92).

Health

Apple Watch Ultra 3

Compared on the health sub-score

Apple Watch Ultra 3 leads on health (96 vs 90).

Value for money

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra more score per dollar ($649 vs $799).

Apple Watch Ultra 3 94
vs
89 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra

Score breakdown

Apple Watch Ultra 3
94
battery 84
display 96
fitness 96
health 96
durability 96
software 0
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra
89
battery 86
display 92
fitness 0
health 90
durability 96
software 86

Specs side-by-side

Apple Watch Ultra 3 versus Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra — full spec comparison
Spec Apple Watch Ultra 3 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra
Chip
Apple S10 chip
Case
49 mm titanium
47 mm titanium
Display
Up to 3000 nits
480×480 LTPO Sapphire OLED
Water resistance
100 m (ISO 22810:2010)
Battery
Up to 42 hours; up to 72 hours in Low Power Mode
100 h power-saver / 36 h standard
Starting price
$799
Chipset
Exynos W1000
Connectivity
GPS L1+L5, BT 5.3, Wi-Fi 6, LTE
Water resist
100 m + IP68

Apple Watch Ultra 3

Pros
  • +49 mm titanium chassis
  • +3000 nit peak display
  • +Up to 42 hours normal use
Cons
  • Same chassis as Ultra 2
  • Expensive at $799
  • Battery only extends to 72 h in low-power

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra

Pros
  • +100 m water resistance
  • +Multi-band GPS L1+L5
  • +Sapphire glass + titanium case
Cons
  • Battery shorter than Apple Watch Ultra
  • No raise-to-wake on low-power
  • Limited iOS support

FAQ: Apple Watch Ultra 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra

Which is better, Apple Watch Ultra 3 or Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra? +

Apple Watch Ultra 3 scores 94 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 5. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Apple Watch Ultra 3 worth the price? +

At $799, Apple Watch Ultra 3 delivers a Specdex score of 94 — strongest in display.

Is Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra worth the price? +

At $649, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in durability.

Does Apple Watch Ultra 3 or Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for display, Apple Watch Ultra 3 or Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra? +

Apple Watch Ultra 3 — leads on display (96 vs 92). Compared on the display sub-score.

Which is better for health, Apple Watch Ultra 3 or Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra? +

Apple Watch Ultra 3 — leads on health (96 vs 90). Compared on the health sub-score.