Alienware
Alienware AW3225QF
32″ 4K QD-OLED · 240Hz · Curved
93
/ 100
From $1,199
VS
Alienware AW3225QF wins by 2
LG
LG 27GR95QE
27″ · 1440p OLED · 240Hz
91
/ 100
From $999
Specdex verdict
Alienware AW3225QF takes it — here’s why.
In our weighted Specdex score, Alienware AW3225QF lands at 93 and LG 27GR95QE at 91. That puts Alienware AW3225QF ahead by 2 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.
Pick Alienware AW3225QF if…
- ✓4K 240Hz QD-OLED
- ✓Dolby Vision HDR
- ✓Excellent HDR brightness for OLED
Pick LG 27GR95QE if…
- ✓Current panel tech
- ✓Strong factory calibration
- ✓Modern connectivity
Alienware AW3225QF 93
vs 91 LG 27GR95QE
Score breakdown
Alienware AW3225QF
93 color 96
motion 98
hdr 94
features 92
LG 27GR95QE
91 color 91
motion 96
hdr 92
features 89
Specs side-by-side
| Spec | Alienware AW3225QF | LG 27GR95QE |
|---|---|---|
| Panel | QD-OLED | 1440p OLED |
| Resolution | 3840×2160 | — |
| Refresh | 240Hz | 240Hz |
| Connectivity | DP 1.4, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 90W | — |
| Size | — | 27" |
| Release year | — | 2023 |
Alienware AW3225QF
Pros
- +4K 240Hz QD-OLED
- +Dolby Vision HDR
- +Excellent HDR brightness for OLED
Cons
- −Curve isn’t for everyone
- −OLED burn-in risk
- −Stand large
LG 27GR95QE
Pros
- +Current panel tech
- +Strong factory calibration
- +Modern connectivity
Cons
- −Stand footprint large on bigger sizes
- −HDR varies by model
- −OLED burn-in risk
FAQ: Alienware AW3225QF vs LG 27GR95QE
Which is better, Alienware AW3225QF or LG 27GR95QE? +
Alienware AW3225QF scores 93 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 2. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.
Is Alienware AW3225QF worth the price? +
At $1,199, Alienware AW3225QF delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in motion.
Is LG 27GR95QE worth the price? +
At $999, LG 27GR95QE delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in motion.
Does Alienware AW3225QF or LG 27GR95QE last longer? +
Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.