Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
AirPods Max (USB-C) — H1 · Spatial Audio · Dynamic Head Tracking
Apple

AirPods Max (USB-C)

H1 · Spatial Audio · Dynamic Head Tracking

88
/ 100
From $549
VS
Sennheiser HD 650 wins by 2
Sennheiser HD 650 — Over-ear · 2003
Sennheiser

Sennheiser HD 650

Over-ear · 2003

90
/ 100
From $499
Specdex verdict

Sennheiser HD 650 takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, AirPods Max (USB-C) lands at 88 and Sennheiser HD 650 at 90. That puts Sennheiser HD 650 ahead by 2 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick AirPods Max (USB-C) if…

  • ✓Premium aluminum build
  • ✓Seamless Apple integration
  • ✓Head-tracked spatial audio

Pick Sennheiser HD 650 if…

  • ✓Flagship comfort + ANC on modern models
  • ✓Premium build
  • ✓Active noise cancellation (most models)
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Sound quality

AirPods Max (USB-C)

Tuning, detail, and staging

AirPods Max (USB-C) leads on sound (92 vs 90).

Noise cancelling

AirPods Max (USB-C)

ANC strength for commute and travel

AirPods Max (USB-C) leads on anc (92 vs 88).

Comfort

Sennheiser HD 650

Long-session wearability

Sennheiser HD 650 leads on comfort (89 vs 82).

Value for money

Sennheiser HD 650

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Sennheiser HD 650 more score per dollar ($499 vs $549).

AirPods Max (USB-C) 88
vs
90 Sennheiser HD 650

Score breakdown

AirPods Max (USB-C)
88
anc 92
sound 92
comfort 82
battery 82
features 86
Sennheiser HD 650
90
anc 88
sound 90
comfort 89
battery 82
features 86

Specs side-by-side

AirPods Max (USB-C) versus Sennheiser HD 650 — full spec comparison
Spec AirPods Max (USB-C) Sennheiser HD 650
Driver
40 mm dynamic
—
Codecs
AAC, SBC
—
Battery
20 h
—
Weight
384 g
—
Connectivity
BT 5.0, USB-C lossless
—
Type
—
Over-ear
Release year
—
2003

AirPods Max (USB-C)

Pros
  • +Premium aluminum build
  • +Seamless Apple integration
  • +Head-tracked spatial audio
Cons
  • −Still uses H1 (not H2)
  • −Heavy at 384 g
  • −No power button / auto-pause

Sennheiser HD 650

Pros
  • +Flagship comfort + ANC on modern models
  • +Premium build
  • +Active noise cancellation (most models)
Cons
  • −Battery varies by codec
  • −Some are Bluetooth-only
  • −Price creep vs previous gen

FAQ: AirPods Max (USB-C) vs Sennheiser HD 650

Which is better, AirPods Max (USB-C) or Sennheiser HD 650? +

Sennheiser HD 650 scores 90 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 2. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is AirPods Max (USB-C) worth the price? +

At $549, AirPods Max (USB-C) delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in anc.

Is Sennheiser HD 650 worth the price? +

At $499, Sennheiser HD 650 delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in sound.

Does AirPods Max (USB-C) or Sennheiser HD 650 last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for sound quality, AirPods Max (USB-C) or Sennheiser HD 650? +

AirPods Max (USB-C) — leads on sound (92 vs 90). Tuning, detail, and staging.

Which is better for noise cancelling, AirPods Max (USB-C) or Sennheiser HD 650? +

AirPods Max (USB-C) — leads on anc (92 vs 88). ANC strength for commute and travel.