Apple
AirPods (2nd gen) · Arctic White
True-wireless · 2019
76
/ 100
From $159
VS
Apple
AirPods (2nd gen)
True-wireless · 2019
76
/ 100
From $159
Specdex verdict
Dead heat — it comes down to priorities.
In our weighted Specdex score, AirPods (2nd gen) · Arctic White lands at 76 and AirPods (2nd gen) at 76. With scores tied, the decision hinges on which sub-scores matter most to you.
Pick AirPods (2nd gen) · Arctic White if…
- ✓Compact carry
- ✓Platform integration (brand-dependent)
- ✓Quick pair
Pick AirPods (2nd gen) if…
- ✓Compact carry
- ✓Platform integration (brand-dependent)
- ✓Quick pair
AirPods (2nd gen) · Arctic White 76
vs 76 AirPods (2nd gen)
Score breakdown
AirPods (2nd gen) · Arctic White
76 anc 73
sound 75
comfort 74
battery 78
features 72
AirPods (2nd gen)
76 anc 73
sound 75
comfort 74
battery 78
features 72
Specs side-by-side
| Spec | AirPods (2nd gen) · Arctic White | AirPods (2nd gen) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | True-wireless | True-wireless |
| Release year | 2019 | 2019 |
AirPods (2nd gen) · Arctic White
Pros
- +Compact carry
- +Platform integration (brand-dependent)
- +Quick pair
Cons
- −Battery life limited
- −Fit varies by ear
- −Case bulkier than pod
AirPods (2nd gen)
Pros
- +Compact carry
- +Platform integration (brand-dependent)
- +Quick pair
Cons
- −Battery life limited
- −Fit varies by ear
- −Case bulkier than pod
FAQ: AirPods (2nd gen) · Arctic White vs AirPods (2nd gen)
Which is better, AirPods (2nd gen) · Arctic White or AirPods (2nd gen)? +
Both score 76 on our weighted rubric — tied. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.
Is AirPods (2nd gen) · Arctic White worth the price? +
At $159, AirPods (2nd gen) · Arctic White delivers a Specdex score of 76 — strongest in battery.
Is AirPods (2nd gen) worth the price? +
At $159, AirPods (2nd gen) delivers a Specdex score of 76 — strongest in battery.
Does AirPods (2nd gen) · Arctic White or AirPods (2nd gen) last longer? +
Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.