Samsung
Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65"
QD-OLED · Glare-Free · One Connect
95
/ 100
From $3,399
VS
Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" wins by 2
LG
LG C4 OLED 65"
OLED evo · α9 Gen 7 · 144Hz
93
/ 100
From $2,499
Specdex verdict
Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" takes it — here’s why.
In our weighted Specdex score, Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" lands at 95 and LG C4 OLED 65" at 93. That puts Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" ahead by 2 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.
Pick Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" if…
- ✓Best anti-glare finish ever
- ✓QD-OLED color volume
- ✓One Connect box
Pick LG C4 OLED 65" if…
- ✓Gold-standard midrange OLED
- ✓4× HDMI 2.1 @ 144Hz
- ✓Dolby Vision gaming
Score breakdown
Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65"
95 picture 97
motion 96
gaming 96
smart 84
sound 78
LG C4 OLED 65"
93 picture 94
motion 96
gaming 96
smart 84
sound 78
Specs side-by-side
Spec
Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65"
LG C4 OLED 65"
Panel
QD-OLED
OLED evo
Size
65″
65″
Refresh
144Hz
144Hz
HDR
HDR10+, HLG
Dolby Vision, HDR10
HDMI
4× HDMI 2.1
4× HDMI 2.1
Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65"
Pros
- +Best anti-glare finish ever
- +QD-OLED color volume
- +One Connect box
Cons
- −No Dolby Vision
- −Anti-glare layer softens darks slightly
- −Tizen ads
LG C4 OLED 65"
Pros
- +Gold-standard midrange OLED
- +4× HDMI 2.1 @ 144Hz
- +Dolby Vision gaming
Cons
- −Less bright than G4/S95D
- −No HDR10+
- −webOS ads
FAQ: Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" vs LG C4 OLED 65"
Which is better, Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" or LG C4 OLED 65"? +
Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 2. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.
Is Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" worth the price? +
At $3,399, Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in picture.
Is LG C4 OLED 65" worth the price? +
At $2,499, LG C4 OLED 65" delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in motion.
Does Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" or LG C4 OLED 65" last longer? +
Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.